Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 488

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Beta-Adrenergic–Antagonist Drugs in the Prevention of Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Patients with Cirrhosis and Esophageal Varices: An Analysis of Data and Prognostic Factors in 589 Patients from Four Randomized Clinical Trials

Poynard, Thierry, Calès, Paul, Pasta, Linda, Ideo, Gaetano, Pascal, Jean-Pierre, Pagliaro, Luigi, Lebrec, Didier, the Franco–Italian Multicenter Study Group*·1991·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The value of beta-adrenergic-antagonist drug therapy for the prevention of initial episodes of gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with cirrhosis and esophageal varices is uncertain, both positive and negative study results having been reported. METHODS: In this study, we analyzed data on individual patients from four randomized, controlled trials to assess the efficacy of this treatment. Of the 589 patients studied, 286 received a beta-adrenergic-antagonist drug (propranolol in 203 and nadolol in 83) and 303 received placebo. RESULTS: After two years, the mean (+/- SE) percentage of patients who had had no upper gastrointestinal bleeding was 78 +/- 3 percent in the beta-adrenergic-antagonist treatment group and 65 +/- 3 percent in the control group (P = 0.002). The percentage of patients without fatal bleeding was 90 +/- 2 percent in the treatment group and 82 +/- 3 percent in the control group (P = 0.01). The percentage of patients surviving after two years was 71 +/- 3 percent in the treatment group and 68 +/- 3 percent in the control group (P = 0.34). After age and severity of cirrhosis were taken into account, the survival rate was better in the treatment group (P = 0.09). The percentage of surviving patients who had had no bleeding after two years was 62 +/- 3 percent in the treatment group and 53 +/- 3 percent in the control group (P = 0.04). Both propranolol and nadolol prevented a first episode of bleeding. Severe cirrhosis and especially the presence of ascites were associated with bleeding (P less than 0.001) and death (P less than 0.001) in both groups. The efficacy of beta-adrenergic-antagonist therapy in the prevention of bleeding (P less than 0.001) and of fatal bleeding (P = 0.004) and in the prevention of bleeding or death (P = 0.005) was the same after adjustment for cause and severity of cirrhosis, ascites, and size of varices. CONCLUSIONS: Propranolol and nadolol are effective in preventing first bleeding and reducing the mortality rate associated with gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with cirrhosis, regardless of severity.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejm199105303242202

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 488

Metadata

Authors
Poynard, T., Calès, P., Pasta, L., Ideo, G., Pascal, J.-P., Pagliaro, L., Lebrec, D., & the Franco–Italian Multicenter Study Group*
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
1991-05-30
Volume
324
Issue
22
Pages
1532-1538
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2328498131
Cited by
488
References
0
FWCI
9.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Beta-Adrenergic–Antagonist Drugs in the Prevention of Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Patients with Cirrhosis and Esophageal Varices: An Analysis of Data and Prognostic Factors in 589 Patients from Four Randomized Clinical Trials. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm199105303242202
The paper
Poynard, T., Calès, P., Pasta, L., Ideo, G., Pascal, J.-P., Pagliaro, L., Lebrec, D., & the Franco–Italian Multicenter Study Group*. (1991). Beta-Adrenergic–Antagonist Drugs in the Prevention of Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Patients with Cirrhosis and Esophageal Varices: An Analysis of Data and Prognostic Factors in 589 Patients from Four Randomized Clinical Trials. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199105303242202

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.