Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,920

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Comparison of Plasma Exchange with Plasma Infusion in the Treatment of Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura

Open access
Rock, Gail A., Shumak, Kenneth H., Buskard, Noel A., Blanchette, Victor S., Kelton, John G., Nair, Rama C., Spasoff, Robert A.·1991·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura is an uncommon disease with a high mortality rate even with current treatment. The cause of the syndrome and its optimal treatment are unknown. Although both plasma exchange and plasma infusion have been useful treatments, it is not clear which is superior. In this report we describe a prospective randomized trial comparing plasma exchange with plasma infusion for the treatment of thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura. METHODS: One hundred two patients with thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura were randomly assigned to receive either plasma exchange or plasma infusion with fresh-frozen plasma on seven of the first nine days after entry into the trial. The total volume of plasma received by patients undergoing plasma exchange was three times that received by patients undergoing plasma infusion. All the patients also received aspirin and dipyridamole. The outcomes in the two groups were compared at the end of the first treatment cycle (day 9) and after six months. RESULTS: At the end of the first treatment cycle patients receiving plasma exchange had a higher rate of response as defined by an increase in the platelet count (24 of 51 patients) than those who received plasma infusion (13 of 51, P = 0.025). Of the 51 patients treated with plasma exchange, 2 died, whereas 8 of the 51 patients who received plasma infusion died (P = 0.035). After six months the outcome in the plasma-exchange group was still superior, with a response observed in 40 of 51 patients, whereas 25 of 51 patients in the plasma-infusion group responded (P = 0.002). Eleven patients in the plasma-exchange group died, as did 19 patients in the plasma-infusion group (P = 0.036). The overall mortality was 29 percent. CONCLUSIONS: Plasma exchange is more effective than plasma infusion in the treatment of thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejm199108083250604

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 1,920

Metadata

Authors
Rock, G. A., Shumak, K. H., Buskard, N. A., Blanchette, V. S., Kelton, J. G., Nair, R. C., & Spasoff, R. A.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
1991-08-08
Volume
325
Issue
6
Pages
393-397
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2334213116
Cited by
1,920
References
2
FWCI
8.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of Plasma Exchange with Plasma Infusion in the Treatment of Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm199108083250604
The paper
Rock, G. A., Shumak, K. H., Buskard, N. A., Blanchette, V. S., Kelton, J. G., Nair, R. C., & Spasoff, R. A. (1991). Comparison of Plasma Exchange with Plasma Infusion in the Treatment of Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199108083250604

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.