Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 253

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Diarrheal Disease during Operation Desert Shield

Open access
Hyams, Kenneth C., Bourgeois, August L., Merrell, Bruce R., Rozmajzl, Patrick, Escamilla, Joel, Thornton, Scott A., Wasserman, Glenn M., Burke, Arlene, Echeverria, Peter, Green, Kim Y., Kapikian, Albert Z., Woody, James N.·1991·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Under combat conditions infectious disease can become a major threat to military forces. During Operation Desert Shield, there were numerous outbreaks of diarrhea among the U.S. forces. To evaluate the causes of and risk factors for diarrheal disease, we collected clinical and epidemiologic data from U.S. troops stationed in northeastern Saudi Arabia. METHODS: Between September and December 1990, stool cultures for enteric pathogens were obtained from 432 military personnel who presented with diarrhea, cramps, vomiting, or hematochezia. In addition, a questionnaire was administered to 2022 soldiers in U.S. military units located in various regions of Saudi Arabia. RESULTS: A bacterial enteric pathogen was identified in 49.5 percent of the troops with gastroenteritis. Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli and Shigella sonnei were the most common bacterial pathogens. Of 125 E. coli infections, 39 percent were resistant to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, 63 percent to tetracycline, and 48 percent to ampicillin. Of 113 shigella infections, 85 percent were resistant to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, 68 percent to tetracycline, and 21 percent to ampicillin. All bacterial isolates were sensitive to norfloxacin and ciprofloxacin. After an average of two months in Saudi Arabia, 57 percent of the surveyed troops had at least one episode of diarrhea, and 20 percent reported that they were temporarily unable to carry out their duties because of diarrheal symptoms. Vomiting was infrequently reported as a primary symptom, but of 11 military personnel in whom vomiting was a major symptom, 9 (82 percent) had serologic evidence of infection with the Norwalk virus. CONCLUSIONS: Gastroenteritis caused by enterotoxigenic E. coli and shigella resistant to a number of drugs was a major problem that frequently interfered with the duties of U.S. troops during Operation Desert Shield.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejm199111143252006

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 253

Metadata

Authors
Hyams, K. C., Bourgeois, A. L., Merrell, B. R., Rozmajzl, P., Escamilla, J., Thornton, S. A., Wasserman, G. M., Burke, A., Echeverria, P., Green, K. Y., Kapikian, A. Z., & Woody, J. N.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
1991-11-14
Volume
325
Issue
20
Pages
1423-1428
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2339502380
Cited by
253
References
1
FWCI
29.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Diarrheal Disease during Operation Desert Shield. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm199111143252006
The paper
Hyams, K. C., Bourgeois, A. L., Merrell, B. R., Rozmajzl, P., Escamilla, J., Thornton, S. A., Wasserman, G. M., Burke, A., Echeverria, P., Green, K. Y., Kapikian, A. Z., & Woody, J. N. (1991). Diarrheal Disease during Operation Desert Shield. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199111143252006

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.