Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 301

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Plasma Exchange in Polyneuropathy Associated with Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance

Open access
Dyck, Peter James, Low, Phillip A., Windebank, Anthony J., Jaradeh, Safwan S., Gosselin, Sylvie, Bourque, Pierre, Smith, Benn E., Kratz, Kathleen M., Karnes, Jeannine L., Evans, Bruce A., Pineda, Alvaro A., O'Brien, Peter C., Kyle, Robert A.·1991·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Polyneuropathy associated with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) has been treated with plasma exchange, intravenous immune globulin, and chemotherapy, but the effectiveness of these treatments remains uncertain. METHODS: We randomly assigned 39 patients with stable or worsening neuropathy and MGUS of the IgG, IgA, or IgM type to receive either plasma exchange twice weekly for three weeks or sham plasma exchange, in a double-blind trial. The patients who initially underwent sham plasma exchange subsequently underwent plasma exchange in an open trial. RESULTS: In the double-blind trial, the average neuropathy disability score improved by 2 points from base line (from 62.5 to 60.5) in the sham-exchange group and by 12 points (from 58.3 to 46.3) in the plasma-exchange group (P = 0.06). A similar difference was observed in the weakness score, a component of the neuropathy disability score (improvement, 1 and 10 points, respectively; P = 0.07). After treatment the summed compound muscle action potentials of motor nerves were 1.2 mV lower (worse) than at base line in the sham-exchange group and 0.4 mV higher (better) in the plasma-exchange group (P = 0.07). The greater degree of improvement with plasma exchange was equal in magnitude to or greater than the difference between not being able to walk on the heels or toes and being able to perform these activities. Changes in the vibratory detection threshold, summed motor-nerve conduction velocity, and sensory-nerve action potentials did not differ significantly between the treatment groups. In the open trial, in which patients who initially underwent sham exchange were treated with plasma exchange, the neuropathy disability score (P = 0.04), weakness score (P = 0.07), and summed compound muscle action potentials (P = 0.07) improved more with plasma exchange than they had with sham exchange. In both the double-blind and the open trial, those with IgG or IgA gammopathy had a better response to plasma exchange than those with IgM gammopathy. CONCLUSIONS: Plasma exchange appears to be efficacious in neuropathy associated with MGUS, especially of the IgG or IgA type.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejm199111213252105

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Metadata

Authors
Dyck, P. J., Low, P. A., Windebank, A. J., Jaradeh, S. S., Gosselin, S., Bourque, P., Smith, B. E., Kratz, K. M., Karnes, J. L., Evans, B. A., Pineda, A. A., O'Brien, P. C., & Kyle, R. A.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
1991-11-21
Volume
325
Issue
21
Pages
1482-1486
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2323008186
Cited by
301
References
0
FWCI
11.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Plasma Exchange in Polyneuropathy Associated with Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm199111213252105
The paper
Dyck, P. J., Low, P. A., Windebank, A. J., Jaradeh, S. S., Gosselin, S., Bourque, P., Smith, B. E., Kratz, K. M., Karnes, J. L., Evans, B. A., Pineda, A. A., O'Brien, P. C., & Kyle, R. A. (1991). Plasma Exchange in Polyneuropathy Associated with Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199111213252105

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.