The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mortality in Patients with the Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome Treated with either Foscarnet or Ganciclovir for Cytomegalovirus Retinitis
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND METHODS: We performed a multicenter, randomized, unblinded clinical trial (the Foscarnet-Ganciclovir Cytomegalovirus Retinitis Trial) designed to compare ganciclovir with foscarnet in the treatment of cytomegalovirus retinitis in patients with the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS). Of 234 patients, 127 were randomly assigned to ganciclovir and 107 to foscarnet; the study drugs were administered according to a common protocol at the 11 participating clinical centers. Antiretroviral therapy (with zidovudine, didanosine, or dideoxycytidine) was given as dictated by best medical judgment. The patients were followed for the progression of retinitis, visual loss, and death. RESULTS: Excess mortality in the ganciclovir group (as compared with the foscarnet group) led the Policy and Data Monitoring Board to recommend suspension of the treatment protocol 19 months after the trial started. As of that time, 65 of the patients assigned to ganciclovir had died, as compared with 36 of those assigned to foscarnet (51 percent vs. 34 percent, P = 0.007; relative risk, 1.79; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.17 to 2.73). The median survival was 8.5 months in the ganciclovir group and 12.6 months in the foscarnet group. Although the patients assigned to ganciclovir received less antiretroviral therapy on average than those assigned to foscarnet, the excess mortality could not be explained entirely by differences in exposure to antiretroviral drugs. In the forscarnet group, the only subgroup of patients identified as having excess mortality were those whose renal function was compromised at entry. There was no difference between the two treatment groups in the rate of progression of retinitis (relative risk, 0.95; P = 0.751). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that for patients with AIDS, and cytomegalovirus retinitis, treatment with foscarnet offers a survival advantage over treatment with ganciclovir, although the patients may not tolerate foscarnet as well as ganciclovir.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
McCullagh, P., & Nelder, J. A. (1989) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-3242-6 · Cited by 16,836
Asymptotically Efficient Rank Invariant Test Procedures
Peto, R., & Peto, J. (1972) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General) · doi:10.2307/2344317 · Cited by 3,393
Yusuf, S. (1991) · JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association · doi:10.1001/jama.1991.03470010097038 · Cited by 1,014
Cited by
Oral Ganciclovir for the Prevention of Cytomegalovirus Disease in Persons with AIDS
Spector, S. A., McKinley, G. F., Lalezari, J. P., Samo, T., Andruczk, R., Follansbee, S., Sparti, P. D., Havlir, D. V., Simpson, G., Buhles, W., et al. (1996) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199606063342302 · Cited by 308
Metadata
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 1992-01-23
- Volume
- 326
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 213-220
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2597824021
- Cited by
- 487
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 54.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mortality in Patients with the Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome Treated with either Foscarnet or Ganciclovir for Cytomegalovirus Retinitis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm199201233260401
- The paper
- Mortality in Patients with the Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome Treated with either Foscarnet or Ganciclovir for Cytomegalovirus Retinitis. (1992). New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199201233260401
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.