The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Corticosteroids in the Treatment of Acute Optic Neuritis
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND AND METHODS: The use of corticosteroids to treat optic neuritis is controversial. At 15 clinical centers, we randomly assigned 457 patients with acute optic neuritis to receive oral prednisone (1 mg per kilogram of body weight per day) for 14 days; intravenous methylprednisolone (1 g per day) for 3 days, followed by oral prednisone (1 mg per kilogram per day) for 11 days; or oral placebo for 14 days. Visual function was assessed over a six-month follow-up period. RESULTS: Visual function recovered faster in the group receiving intravenous methylprednisolone than in the placebo group; this was particularly true for the reversal of visual-field defects (P = 0.0001). Although the differences between the groups decreased with time, at six months the group that received intravenous methylprednisolone still had slightly better visual fields (P = 0.054), contrast sensitivity (P = 0.026), and color vision (P = 0.033) but not better visual acuity (P = 0.66). The outcome in the oral-prednisone group did not differ from that in the placebo group. In addition, the rate of new episodes of optic neuritis in either eye was higher in the group receiving oral prednisone, but not the group receiving intravenous methylprednisolone, than in the placebo group (relative risk for oral prednisone vs. placebo, 1.79; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.08 to 2.95). CONCLUSIONS: Intravenous methylprednisolone followed by oral prednisone speeds the recovery of visual loss due to optic neuritis and results in slightly better vision at six months. Oral prednisone alone, as prescribed in this study, is an ineffective treatment and increases the risk of new episodes of optic neuritis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Individual Comparisons by Ranking Methods
Wilcoxon, F. (1945) · Biometrics Bulletin · doi:10.2307/3001968 · Cited by 15,354
Statistical Aspects of the Analysis of Data From Retrospective Studies of Disease
(1959) · JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/22.4.719 · Cited by 14,689
Cited by
Compston, A., & Coles, A. (2002) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(02)08220-x · Cited by 1,743
Relation of Visual Function to Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness in Multiple Sclerosis
FISHER, J., JACOBS, D., MARKOWITZ, C., GALETTA, S., VOLPE, N., NANOSCHIAVI, M., BAIER, M., FROHMAN, E., WINSLOW, H., & FROHMAN, T. (2006) · Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2005.10.040 · Cited by 658
Diagnosis and classification of optic neuritis
Petzold, A., Fraser, C. L., Abegg, M., Alroughani, R., Alshowaeir, D., Alvarenga, R., Andris, C., Asgari, N., Barnett, Y., Battistella, R., et al. (2022) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(22)00200-9 · Cited by 330
Treatments for spasticity and pain in multiple sclerosis: a systematic review
Beard, S., Hunn, A., & Wight, J. (2003) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta7400 · Cited by 266
Metadata
- Authors
- Beck, R. W., Cleary, P. A., Anderson, M. M., Keltner, J. L., Shults, W. T., Kaufman, D. I., Buckley, E. G., Corbett, J. J., Kupersmith, M. J., Miller, N. R., Savino, P. J., Guy, J. R., Trobe, J. D., McCrary, J. A., Smith, C. H., Chrousos, G. A., Thompson, H. S., Katz, B. J., Brodsky, M. C., Goodwin, J. A., & Atwell, C. W.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 1992-02-27
- Volume
- 326
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 581-588
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2326911230
- Cited by
- 1,355
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 24.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Corticosteroids in the Treatment of Acute Optic Neuritis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm199202273260901
- The paper
- Beck, R. W., Cleary, P. A., Anderson, M. M., Keltner, J. L., Shults, W. T., Kaufman, D. I., Buckley, E. G., Corbett, J. J., Kupersmith, M. J., Miller, N. R., Savino, P. J., Guy, J. R., Trobe, J. D., McCrary, J. A., Smith, C. H., Chrousos, G. A., Thompson, H. S., Katz, B. J., Brodsky, M. C., . . . Atwell, C. W. (1992). A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Corticosteroids in the Treatment of Acute Optic Neuritis. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199202273260901
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.