Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 477

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Geographic Variation in the Treatment of Localized Breast Cancer

Open access
Farrow, Diana C., Hunt, William C., Samet, Jonathan M.·1992·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Breast-conserving surgery followed by radiation therapy is as effective as modified radical mastectomy in treating women with localized breast cancer, as demonstrated by clinical trials reported during the 1980s. The extent to which breast-conserving surgery has been adopted in various regions of the United States is not known. METHODS: We assessed variations in the use of breast-conserving surgery from 1983 to 1986 in 18,399 non-Hispanic white, 324 Hispanic, and 1174 black women with breast cancer in nine areas of the United States, using data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End-Results Program of the National Cancer Institute. RESULTS: The proportion of white women with localized breast cancer who underwent breast-conserving surgery ranged from 9.2 percent (Iowa) to 32.1 percent (Seattle) in 1983-1984 and from 19.6 percent (Iowa) to 41.5 percent (Seattle) in 1985-1986. Between 1983 and 1986, the use of breast-conserving surgery increased in each area, but the relative rankings of the areas changed little. The frequency of the use of breast-conserving surgery in black and Hispanic women was comparable to that in white women. The proportion of women who received radiation therapy after breast-conserving surgery also varied geographically and increased from 1983 to 1986 in all areas. Older women in all areas and black women in Atlanta and Detroit were less likely than other women to receive radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery. CONCLUSIONS: There is marked variation in the United States in the use of breast-conserving surgery for localized breast cancer. The variation is not explained by demographic factors, although race and age affect the use of radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejm199204233261701

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 477

Metadata

Authors
Farrow, D. C., Hunt, W. C., & Samet, J. M.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
1992-04-23
Volume
326
Issue
17
Pages
1097-1101
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2338469664
Cited by
477
References
0
FWCI
11.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Geographic Variation in the Treatment of Localized Breast Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm199204233261701
The paper
Farrow, D. C., Hunt, W. C., & Samet, J. M. (1992). Geographic Variation in the Treatment of Localized Breast Cancer. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199204233261701

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.