Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 241

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effect of Family History, Body-Fat Distribution, and Reproductive Factors on the Risk of Postmenopausal Breast Cancer

Open access
Sellers, Thomas A., Kushi, Lawrence H., Potter, John D., Kaye, Susan A., Nelson, Christine L., McGovern, Paul G., Folsom, Aaron R.·1992·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A family history of breast cancer reflects shared cultural factors, genetic predisposition, or both. There is evidence that the estimated risk associated with a family history of breast cancer increases multiplicatively in combination with other risk factors. We examined the combined effect of family history and anthropometric and reproductive factors on the risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal women. METHODS: Using data from a prospective cohort study, we studied 37,105 women 55 to 69 years of age to determine whether known risk factors for breast cancer are modified by a reported family history at the time of entry into the study. RESULTS: During the first 4 years of follow-up, 493 new breast cancers were diagnosed. The association of the waist-to-hip ratio (the circumference of the waist divided by that of the hips) with the risk of breast cancer was limited predominantly to women with a family history of breast cancer; the age-adjusted relative risk of breast cancer for the women above the fourth quintile for waist-to-hip ratio as compared with those below the first quintile was 3.2 in women with a family history of breast cancer and 1.2 for women without such a family history. An interaction was observed between a family history of breast cancer and the number of live-born children; the protective effect of higher parity was observed primarily among women with a family history of breast cancer. Similarly, the age-adjusted relative risk of breast cancer associated with a late age at first pregnancy (i.e., greater than or equal to 30 years) was 5.8 for women with a family history of breast cancer and 2.0 for women without such a family history. CONCLUSIONS: The increase in the risk of breast cancer associated with a high waist-to-hip ratio, low parity, or greater age at first pregnancy is more pronounced among women with a family history of breast cancer. These findings suggest etiologic differences between familial breast cancer and the sporadic form.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejm199205143262004

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 241

Metadata

Authors
Sellers, T. A., Kushi, L. H., Potter, J. D., Kaye, S. A., Nelson, C. L., McGovern, P. G., & Folsom, A. R.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
1992-05-14
Volume
326
Issue
20
Pages
1323-1329
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2613056846
Cited by
241
References
2
FWCI
7.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effect of Family History, Body-Fat Distribution, and Reproductive Factors on the Risk of Postmenopausal Breast Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm199205143262004
The paper
Sellers, T. A., Kushi, L. H., Potter, J. D., Kaye, S. A., Nelson, C. L., McGovern, P. G., & Folsom, A. R. (1992). Effect of Family History, Body-Fat Distribution, and Reproductive Factors on the Risk of Postmenopausal Breast Cancer. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199205143262004

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.