The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Localization of Pancreatic Endocrine Tumors by Endoscopic Ultrasonography
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: After a pancreatic endocrine tumor has been diagnosed on the basis of clinical signs and the results of laboratory tests, localization of the tumor by the usual imaging procedures fails in as many as 40 to 60 percent of patients. Endoscopic ultrasonography, a sensitive test for small carcinomas of the pancreas, might also be useful in patients with endocrine tumors of the pancreas that cannot be localized by conventional methods. METHODS: We studied 37 patients later shown to have 39 endocrine tumors of the pancreas who had negative results on transabdominal ultrasonography and CT. All the patients underwent endoscopic ultrasonography, and 22 also underwent selective angiography. All the tumors were confirmed by surgical excision and immunohistologic examination; they consisted of 31 insulinomas, 7 gastrinomas, and 1 glucagonoma, 0.5 to 2.5 cm (mean, 1.4 cm) in diameter. All but one of the patients were cured of their disease, as ascertained by at least six months of clinical and laboratory follow-up. RESULTS: Using endoscopic ultrasonography, we were able to localize 32 of the 39 tumors (sensitivity, 82 percent); no tumor was incorrectly localized. The size of the tumors was very similar (within 2 mm) to that predicted by endoscopic ultrasonography. Among the 22 patients who underwent both angiography and endoscopic ultrasonography, ultrasonography was significantly more sensitive than angiography for tumor localization (sensitivity, 82 percent vs. 27 percent). Among 19 control patients without pancreatic endocrine tumors, endoscopic ultrasonography was negative in 18 (specificity, 95 percent). CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic ultrasonography is a highly sensitive and specific procedure for the localization of pancreatic endocrine tumors. It should be considered for the preoperative localization of such tumors once the clinical and laboratory diagnosis has been established.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The diagnosis and medical management of advanced neuroendocrine tumors.
Kaltsas, G. A., Besser, G. M., & Grossman, A. B. (2004) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/er.2003-0014 · Cited by 674
Service, F. J. (1995) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199504273321707 · Cited by 503
Simultaneous functional photoacoustic and ultrasonic endoscopy of internal organs in vivo
Yang, J.-M., Favazza, C., Chen, R., Yao, J., Cai, X., Maslov, K., Zhou, Q., Shung, K. K., & Wang, L. V. (2012) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm.2823 · Cited by 429
Endoscopic ultrasound in the localisation of pancreatic islet cell tumours.
McLean, A. M., & Fairclough, P. D. (2005) · Best Practice & Research Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1016/j.beem.2004.11.012 · Cited by 163
Griniatsos, J. E., Dimitriou, N., Zilos, A., Sakellariou, S., Evangelou, K., Kamakari, S., Korkolopoulou, P., & Kaltsas, G. (2011) · World Journal of Surgical Oncology · doi:10.1186/1477-7819-9-6 · Cited by 22
Metadata
- Authors
- Rösch, T., Lightdale, C. J., Botet, J. F., Boyce, G. A., Sivak, M. V., Yasuda, K., Heyder, N., Palazzo, L., Dancygier, H., Schusdziarra, V., & Classen, M.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 1992-06-25
- Volume
- 326
- Issue
- 26
- Pages
- 1721-1726
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2337046339
- Cited by
- 713
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 18.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Localization of Pancreatic Endocrine Tumors by Endoscopic Ultrasonography. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm199206253262601
- The paper
- Rösch, T., Lightdale, C. J., Botet, J. F., Boyce, G. A., Sivak, M. V., Yasuda, K., Heyder, N., Palazzo, L., Dancygier, H., Schusdziarra, V., & Classen, M. (1992). Localization of Pancreatic Endocrine Tumors by Endoscopic Ultrasonography. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199206253262601
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.