Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 713

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Localization of Pancreatic Endocrine Tumors by Endoscopic Ultrasonography

Open access
Rösch, Thomas, Lightdale, Charles J., Botet, Jose F., Boyce, Gregory A., Sivak, Michael V., Yasuda, Kenjiro, Heyder, Norbert, Palazzo, Laurent, Dancygier, Henryk, Schusdziarra, Volker, Classen, Meinhard·1992·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: After a pancreatic endocrine tumor has been diagnosed on the basis of clinical signs and the results of laboratory tests, localization of the tumor by the usual imaging procedures fails in as many as 40 to 60 percent of patients. Endoscopic ultrasonography, a sensitive test for small carcinomas of the pancreas, might also be useful in patients with endocrine tumors of the pancreas that cannot be localized by conventional methods. METHODS: We studied 37 patients later shown to have 39 endocrine tumors of the pancreas who had negative results on transabdominal ultrasonography and CT. All the patients underwent endoscopic ultrasonography, and 22 also underwent selective angiography. All the tumors were confirmed by surgical excision and immunohistologic examination; they consisted of 31 insulinomas, 7 gastrinomas, and 1 glucagonoma, 0.5 to 2.5 cm (mean, 1.4 cm) in diameter. All but one of the patients were cured of their disease, as ascertained by at least six months of clinical and laboratory follow-up. RESULTS: Using endoscopic ultrasonography, we were able to localize 32 of the 39 tumors (sensitivity, 82 percent); no tumor was incorrectly localized. The size of the tumors was very similar (within 2 mm) to that predicted by endoscopic ultrasonography. Among the 22 patients who underwent both angiography and endoscopic ultrasonography, ultrasonography was significantly more sensitive than angiography for tumor localization (sensitivity, 82 percent vs. 27 percent). Among 19 control patients without pancreatic endocrine tumors, endoscopic ultrasonography was negative in 18 (specificity, 95 percent). CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic ultrasonography is a highly sensitive and specific procedure for the localization of pancreatic endocrine tumors. It should be considered for the preoperative localization of such tumors once the clinical and laboratory diagnosis has been established.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejm199206253262601

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 713

Metadata

Authors
Rösch, T., Lightdale, C. J., Botet, J. F., Boyce, G. A., Sivak, M. V., Yasuda, K., Heyder, N., Palazzo, L., Dancygier, H., Schusdziarra, V., & Classen, M.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
1992-06-25
Volume
326
Issue
26
Pages
1721-1726
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2337046339
Cited by
713
References
0
FWCI
18.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Localization of Pancreatic Endocrine Tumors by Endoscopic Ultrasonography. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm199206253262601
The paper
Rösch, T., Lightdale, C. J., Botet, J. F., Boyce, G. A., Sivak, M. V., Yasuda, K., Heyder, N., Palazzo, L., Dancygier, H., Schusdziarra, V., & Classen, M. (1992). Localization of Pancreatic Endocrine Tumors by Endoscopic Ultrasonography. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199206253262601

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.