The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Identification of the Uncultured Bacillus of Whipple’s Disease
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Whipple's disease is a systemic disorder known for 85 years to be associated with an uncultured, and therefore unidentified, bacillus. METHODS: We used a molecular genetic approach to identify this organism. The bacterial 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) sequence was amplified directly from tissues of five unrelated patients with Whipple's disease by means of the polymerase chain reaction, first with broad-range primers and then with specific primers. We determined and analyzed the nucleotide sequence of the amplification products. RESULTS: A unique 1321-base bacterial 16S rRNA sequence was amplified from duodenal tissue of one patient. This sequence indicated the presence of a previously uncharacterized organism. We then detected this sequence in tissues from all 5 patients with Whipple's disease, but in none of those from 10 patients without the disorder. According to phylogenetic analysis, this bacterium is a gram-positive actinomycete that is not closely related to any known genus. CONCLUSIONS: We have identified the uncultured bacillus associated with Whipple's disease. The phylogenetic relations of this bacterium, its distinct morphologic characteristics, and the unusual features of the disease are sufficient grounds for naming this bacillus Tropheryma whippelii gen. nov. sp. nov. Our findings also provide a basis for a specific diagnostic test for this organism.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Evolution of Protein Molecules
JUKES, T. H., & CANTOR, C. R. (1969) · Mammalian Protein Metabolism · doi:10.1016/b978-1-4832-3211-9.50009-7 · Cited by 11,032
Towards a natural system of organisms: proposal for the domains Archaea, Bacteria, and Eucarya.
Woese, C. R., Kandler, O., & Wheelis, M. L. (1990) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.87.12.4576 · Cited by 6,128
Woese, C. R. (1987) · Microbiological Reviews · doi:10.1128/mr.51.2.221-271.1987 · Cited by 5,042
The Agent of Bacillary Angiomatosis: An Approach to the Identification of Uncultured Pathogens
Relman, D. A., Loutit, J. S., Schmidt, T. M., Falkow, S., & Tompkins, L. S. (1990) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199012063232301 · Cited by 901
Self-citation
Cited by
Metagenomic biomarker discovery and explanation
Segata, N., Izard, J., Waldron, L., Gevers, D., Miropolsky, L., Garrett, W. S., & Huttenhower, C. (2011) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2011-12-6-r60 · Cited by 16,192
Reducing the Effects of PCR Amplification and Sequencing Artifacts on 16S rRNA-Based Studies
Schloss, P. D., Gevers, D., & Westcott, S. L. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0027310 · Cited by 2,112
Britton, G. J., Contijoch, E. J., Mogno, I., Vennaro, O. H., Llewellyn, S. R., Ng, R., Li, Z., Mortha, A., Merad, M., Das, A., et al. (2019) · Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2018.12.015 · Cited by 549
Molecular diagnosis of bacterial endocarditis by broad-range PCR amplification and direct sequencing
Goldenberger, D., Künzli, A., Vogt, P., Zbinden, R., & Altwegg, M. (1997) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.35.11.2733-2739.1997 · Cited by 390
COHEN, R. J., SHANNON, B. A., McNEAL, J. E., SHANNON, T., & GARRETT, K. L. (2005) · Journal of Urology · doi:10.1097/01.ju.0000158161.15277.78 · Cited by 246
Metadata
- Authors
- Relman, D. A., Schmidt, T. M., MacDermott, R. P., & Falkow, S.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 1992-07-30
- Volume
- 327
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 293-301
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2335836975
- Cited by
- 1,157
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 33.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Identification of the Uncultured Bacillus of Whipple’s Disease. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm199207303270501
- The paper
- Relman, D. A., Schmidt, T. M., MacDermott, R. P., & Falkow, S. (1992). Identification of the Uncultured Bacillus of Whipple’s Disease. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199207303270501
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.