Fatal and Near-Fatal Anaphylactic Reactions to Food in Children and Adolescents
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND AND METHODS: Reports of fatal or near-fatal anaphylactic reactions to foods in children and adolescents are rare. We identified six children and adolescents who died of anaphylactic reactions to foods and seven others who nearly died and required intubation. All the cases but one occurred in one of three metropolitan areas over a period of 14 months. Our investigations included a review of emergency medical care reports, medical records, and depositions by witnesses to the events, as well as interviews with parents (and some patients). RESULTS: Of the 13 children and adolescents (age range, 2 to 17 years), 12 had asthma that was well controlled. All had known food allergies, but had unknowingly ingested the foods responsible for the reactions. The reactions were to peanuts (four patients), nuts (six patients), eggs (one patient), and milk (two patients), all of which were contained in foods such as candy, cookies, and pastry. The six patients who died had symptoms within 3 to 30 minutes of the ingestion of the allergen, but only two received epinephrine in the first hour. All the patients who survived had symptoms within 5 minutes of allergen ingestion, and all but one received epinephrine within 30 minutes. The course of anaphylaxis was rapidly progressive and uniphasic in seven patients; biphasic, with a relatively symptom-free interval in three; and protracted in three, requiring intubation for 3 to 21 days. CONCLUSIONS: Dangerous anaphylactic reactions to food occur in children and adolescents. The failure to recognize the severity of these reactions and to administer epinephrine promptly increases the risk of a fatal outcome.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Some patients might clearly experience anaphylaxis but not fulfill the criteria for mast cell activation due to a lack of elevation in tryptase.
“On the other hand, some patients might clearly experience anaphylaxis but not fulfill the criteria for MCA due to a lack of elevation in tryptase.”
From Diagnostic Significance of Tryptase for Suspected Mast Cell Disorders (2023) · cites this paper as [31]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 18 · Cited by 1,609
- Authors
- Sampson, H. A., Mendelson, L., & Rosen, J. P.
- Affiliations
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- Hartford Hospital (US)
- ORCID
- Sampson, Hugh A.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 1992-08-06
- Volume
- 327
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 380-384
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2327922071
- Cited by
- 1,609
- References
- 18
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 39 · 2016: 53 · 2015: 51 · 2014: 61 · 2013: 70 · 2012: 55
- FWCI
- 9.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (7r01ai024439-11)
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (AI 24439)
- National Center for Research Resources (RR 000 52)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Immunology and Allergy › Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Drug-Induced Adverse Reactions
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Eosinophilic Esophagitis
- Keywords
- food-induced anaphylaxis, food allergy, peanut allergy, nut allergy, asthma, epinephrine administration, biphasic anaphylaxis, children and adolescents, intubation
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Anaphylaxis, Asthma, Child, Child, Preschool, Epinephrine, Female, Food Hypersensitivity, Humans, Male, Peptide Hydrolases
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review