Withdrawal Syndrome after the Double-Blind Cessation of Caffeine Consumption
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: People who stop consuming caffeine may have symptoms, but the incidence and severity of caffeine withdrawal are not known. This study was performed to determine the effects in the general population of ending one's dietary intake of caffeine. METHODS: We studied 62 normal adults whose intake of caffeine was low to moderate (mean amount, 235 mg--the equivalent of 2.5 cups of coffee--per day). They completed questionnaires about symptoms and tests of their mood and performance when consuming their normal diets (base-line period) and at the end of each of two two-day periods during which they consumed caffeine-free diets and under double-blind conditions received capsules containing placebo (placebo period) or caffeine (caffeine period) in amounts equal to their daily caffeine consumption. RESULTS: More subjects had abnormally high Beck Depression Inventory scores (11 percent), high scores on the trait scale of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (8 percent), low vigor scores (11 percent) and high fatigue scores (8 percent) on the Profile of Mood States, and moderate or severe headache (52 percent) during the placebo period than during either the base-line period (2, 0, 0, 0, and 2 percent, respectively; P less than 0.05) or the caffeine period (3, 2, 2, 0, and 6 percent; P less than 0.05). More subjects reported unauthorized use of medications during the placebo period (13 percent) than during the caffeine period (2 percent, P = 0.017). Performance of a tapping task was slower during the placebo period than during the base-line and caffeine periods (P less than 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Persons who consume low or moderate amounts of caffeine may have a withdrawal syndrome after their daily consumption of caffeine ceases.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Caffeine withdrawal has been shown to decrease performance in humans and animals.
“caffeine withdrawal has been shown to decrease performance in both humans (e.g.finger tapping [9]) and animals [10]).”
From Central and peripheral effects of sustained caffeine use: tolerance is incomplete (2002) · cites this paper as [9]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 19 · Cited by 380
- Authors
- Silverman, K., Evans, S. M., Strain, E. C., & Griffiths, R. R.
- Affiliations
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (US)
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 1992-10-15
- Volume
- 327
- Issue
- 16
- Pages
- 1109-1114
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W1968460688
- Cited by
- 380
- References
- 19
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 13.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01 DA03890, R01DA003890)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Coffee research and impacts
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
- Keywords
- caffeine withdrawal, caffeine, depression, anxiety, mood, fatigue, headache, cognitive performance, medication use
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Caffeine, Depression, Diet, Double-Blind Method, Female, Headache, Humans, Interview, Psychological, Male, Psychological Tests, Psychomotor Performance, Surveys and Questionnaires, Substance Withdrawal Syndrome
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review