Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,331

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Meta-Analysis of Thoracic Radiotherapy for Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Open access
Pignon, Jean-Pierre, Arriagada, Rodrigo, Ihde, Daniel C., Johnson, David H., Perry, Michael C., Souhami, Robert L., Brodin, Ola, Joss, Rudolf A., Kies, Merrill S., Lebeau, Bernard, Onoshi, Taisuke, Østerlind, Kell, Tattersall, Martin H.N., Wagner, Henry·1992·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In spite of 16 randomized trials conducted during the past 15 years, the effect of thoracic radiotherapy on the survival of patients with limited small-cell lung cancer remains controversial. The majority of these trials did not have enough statistical power to detect a difference in survival of 5 to 10 percent at five years. This meta-analysis was designed to evaluate the hypothesis that thoracic radiotherapy contributes to a moderate increase in overall survival in limited small-cell lung cancer. METHODS: We collected individual data on all patients enrolled before December 1988 in randomized trials comparing chemotherapy alone with chemotherapy combined with thoracic radiotherapy. Trials that included only patients with extensive disease were excluded. RESULTS: The meta-analysis included 13 trials and 2140 patients with limited disease. A total of 433 patients with extensive disease were excluded. Overall, 1862 of 2103 patients who could be evaluated died; the median follow-up period for the surviving patients was 43 months. The relative risk of death in the combined-therapy group as compared with the chemotherapy group was 0.86 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.78 to 0.94; P = 0.001), corresponding to a 14 percent reduction in the mortality rate. The benefit in terms of overall survival at three years (+/- SD) was 5.4 +/- 1.4 percent. Indirect comparison of early with late radiotherapy and of sequential with non-sequential radiotherapy did not reveal any optimal time for treatment. There was a trend toward a larger reduction in mortality among younger patients: the relative risk of death in the combined-therapy as compared with the chemotherapy group ranged from 0.72 for patients less than 55 years old (95 percent confidence interval, 0.56 to 0.93) to 1.07 (0.70 to 1.64) for patients over 70. CONCLUSIONS: Thoracic radiotherapy moderately improves survival in patients with limited small-cell lung cancer who are treated with combination chemotherapy. Identification of the optimal combination of chemotherapy and radiotherapy will require further trials.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejm199212033272302

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 1,331

Metadata

Authors
Pignon, J.-P., Arriagada, R., Ihde, D. C., Johnson, D. H., Perry, M. C., Souhami, R. L., Brodin, O., Joss, R. A., Kies, M. S., Lebeau, B., Onoshi, T., Østerlind, K., Tattersall, M. H. N., & Wagner, H.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
1992-12-03
Volume
327
Issue
23
Pages
1618-1624
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2341745217
Cited by
1,331
References
1
FWCI
2.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Meta-Analysis of Thoracic Radiotherapy for Small-Cell Lung Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm199212033272302
The paper
Pignon, J.-P., Arriagada, R., Ihde, D. C., Johnson, D. H., Perry, M. C., Souhami, R. L., Brodin, O., Joss, R. A., Kies, M. S., Lebeau, B., Onoshi, T., Østerlind, K., Tattersall, M. H. N., & Wagner, H. (1992). A Meta-Analysis of Thoracic Radiotherapy for Small-Cell Lung Cancer. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199212033272302

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.