Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 282

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Controlled Trial of Aerosolized Pentamidine or Trimethoprim–Sulfamethoxazole as Primary Prophylaxis against Pneumocystis carinii Pneumonia in Patients with Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection

Open access
Schneider, Margriet M.E., Hoepelman, Andy I.M., Schattenkerk, Jan Karel M. Eeftinck, Nielsen, Thyge L., van der Graaf, Yolanda, Frissen, Jos P.H.J., van der Ende, Ineke M.E., Kolsters, Ad F.P., Borleffs, Jan C.C.·1992·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Primary prophylaxis against Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia (PCP) is recommended for patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection if their CD4 cell counts are below 200 per cubic millimeter (0.2 x 10(9) per liter). Either aerosolized pentamidine or trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (co-trimoxazole) is commonly prescribed for prophylaxis, but the relative efficacy and toxicity of these agents are unknown. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter trial involving 215 HIV-infected patients with no history of PCP but with CD4 cell counts below 200 per cubic millimeter. The patients were randomly assigned to one of three regimens: aerosolized pentamidine once a month, 480 mg of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole once a day (80 mg of trimethoprim and 400 mg of sulfamethoxazole), or 960 mg of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole once a day (160 mg and 800 mg, respectively). The cumulative incidence of PCP was estimated by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. RESULTS: After a mean follow-up of 264 days, 6 of the 71 patients in the pentamidine group had a confirmed first episode of PCP (11 percent), whereas none of the 142 patients in the two trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole groups had PCP (P = 0.002). However, adverse events that required discontinuation of the medication were much more frequent in the trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole groups (17 and 18 patients) than in the pentamidine group (2 patients). The adverse reactions occurred significantly sooner in the group given 960 mg of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole than in the group given 480 mg (mean time, 16 vs. 57 days; P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: For patients with HIV infection, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole taken once a day is more effective as primary prophylaxis against PCP than aerosolized pentamidine administered once a month, although adverse drug reactions are more frequent with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejm199212243272603

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 282

Metadata

Authors
Schneider, M. M. E., Hoepelman, A. I. M., Schattenkerk, J. K. M. E., Nielsen, T. L., van der Graaf, Y., Frissen, J. P. H. J., van der Ende, I. M. E., Kolsters, A. F. P., & Borleffs, J. C. C.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
1992-12-24
Volume
327
Issue
26
Pages
1836-1841
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2337303087
Cited by
282
References
1
FWCI
23.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Controlled Trial of Aerosolized Pentamidine or Trimethoprim–Sulfamethoxazole as Primary Prophylaxis against Pneumocystis carinii Pneumonia in Patients with Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm199212243272603
The paper
Schneider, M. M. E., Hoepelman, A. I. M., Schattenkerk, J. K. M. E., Nielsen, T. L., van der Graaf, Y., Frissen, J. P. H. J., van der Ende, I. M. E., Kolsters, A. F. P., & Borleffs, J. C. C. (1992). A Controlled Trial of Aerosolized Pentamidine or Trimethoprim–Sulfamethoxazole as Primary Prophylaxis against Pneumocystis carinii Pneumonia in Patients with Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199212243272603

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.