The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Randomized Comparison of Surveillance Intervals after Colonoscopic Removal of Newly Diagnosed Adenomatous Polyps
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: The identification and removal of adenomatous polyps and post-polypectomy surveillance are considered to be important for the control of colorectal cancer. In current practice, the intervals between colonoscopies after polypectomy are variable, often a year long, and not based on data from randomized clinical trials. We sought to determine whether follow-up colonoscopy at three years would detect important colonic lesions as well as follow-up colonoscopy at both one and three years. METHODS: Patients were eligible if they had one or more adenomas, no previous polypectomy, and a complete colonoscopy and all their polyps had been removed. They were randomly assigned to have follow-up colonoscopy at one and three years or at three years only. The two study end points were the detection of any adenoma, and the detection of adenomas with advanced pathological features (defined as those > 1 cm in diameter and those with high-grade dysplasia or invasive cancer). RESULTS: Of 2632 eligible patients, 1418 were randomly assigned to the two follow-up groups, 699 to the two-examination group and 719 to the one-examination group. The percentage of patients with adenomas in the group examined at one and three years was 41.7 percent, as compared with 32.0 percent in the group examined at three years (P = 0.006). The percentage of patients with adenomas with advanced pathological features was the same in both groups (3.3 percent). CONCLUSIONS: Colonoscopy performed three years after colonoscopic removal of adenomatous polyps detects important colonic lesions as effectively as follow-up colonoscopy after both one and three years. An interval of at least three years is recommended before follow-up colonoscopy after both one and three years. An interval of at least three years is recommended before follow-up examination after colonoscopic removal of newly diagnosed adenomatous polyps. Adoption of this recommendation nationally should reduce the cost of post-polypectomy surveillance and screening.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1990) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.27-3338 · Cited by 35,305
Cited by
Quality indicators for colonoscopy
Rex, D. K., Schoenfeld, P. S., Cohen, J., Pike, I. M., Adler, D. G., Fennerty, M. B., Lieb, J. G., Park, W. G., Rizk, M. K., Sawhney, M. S., et al. (2015) · Gastrointestinal Endoscopy · doi:10.1016/j.gie.2014.07.058 · Cited by 1,764
van Rossum, L. G., van Rijn, A. F., Laheij, R. J., van Oijen, M. G., Fockens, P., van Krieken, H. H., Verbeek, A. L., Jansen, J. B., & Dekker, E. (2008) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2008.03.040 · Cited by 734
The colorectal adenoma–carcinoma sequence
Leslie, A., Carey, F. A., Pratt, N. R., & Steele, R. J. C. (2002) · British Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2168.2002.02120.x · Cited by 734
CT Colonography Reporting and Data System: A Consensus Proposal
Zalis, M. E., Barish, M. A., Choi, J. R., Dachman, A. H., Fenlon, H. M., Ferrucci, J. T., Glick, S. N., Laghi, A., Macari, M., McFarland, E. G., et al. (2005) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2361041926 · Cited by 608
Follow-up of patients with curatively resected colorectal cancer: a practice guideline
Figueredo, A., Rumble, R. B., Maroun, J., Earle, C. C., Cummings, B., McLeod, R., Zuraw, L., Zwaal, C., & the members of the Gastrointestinal Cancer Disease Site Group of Cancer Care Ontario's Program in Evidence-based Care (2003) · BMC Cancer · doi:10.1186/1471-2407-3-26 · Cited by 392
Metadata
- Authors
- Winawer, S. J., Zauber, A. G., O'Brien, M. J., Ho, M. N., Gottlieb, L., Sternberg, S. S., Waye, J. D., Bond, J., Schapiro, M., Stewart, E. T., Panish, J., Ackroyd, F., Kurtz, R. C., & Shike, M.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 1993-04
- Volume
- 328
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 901-906
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2336715068
- Cited by
- 971
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Randomized Comparison of Surveillance Intervals after Colonoscopic Removal of Newly Diagnosed Adenomatous Polyps. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm199304013281301
- The paper
- Winawer, S. J., Zauber, A. G., O'Brien, M. J., Ho, M. N., Gottlieb, L., Sternberg, S. S., Waye, J. D., Bond, J., Schapiro, M., Stewart, E. T., Panish, J., Ackroyd, F., Kurtz, R. C., & Shike, M. (1993). Randomized Comparison of Surveillance Intervals after Colonoscopic Removal of Newly Diagnosed Adenomatous Polyps. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199304013281301
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.