Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 333

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease Type 1A -- Association with a Spontaneous Point Mutation in the PMP22 Gene

Open access
Roa, Benjamin B., Garcia, Carlos A., Suter, Ueli, Kulpa, Deanna A., Wise, Carol A., Mueller, Jane, Welcher, Andrew A., Snipes, G. Jackson, Shooter, Eric M., Patel, Pragna I., Lupski, James R.·1993·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (CMT) is the most common inherited peripheral neuropathy. CMT type 1A is associated with a 1.5-megabase DNA duplication in region p11.2-p12 of chromosome 17 in most patients. An increased dosage of a gene within the duplicated segment appears to cause the disease. The PMP22 gene, which encodes a myelin protein, has been mapped within the duplication and proposed as a candidate gene for CMT type 1A. METHODS: We analyzed DNA samples from a cohort of 32 unrelated patients with CMT type 1 who did not have the 1.5-Mb tandem duplication in 17p11.2-p12 for mutations within the PMP22 coding region. Molecular techniques included the polymerase chain reaction (PCR), heteroduplex analysis to detect point mutations, and direct nucleotide-sequence determination of amplified PCR products. RESULTS: A 10-year-old boy was identified with a point mutation in PMP22, which resulted in the substitution of cysteine for serine in a putative transmembrane domain of PMP22. Analysis of family members revealed that the PMP22 point mutation arose spontaneously and segregated with the CMT type 1 phenotype in an autosomal dominant pattern. The patients with the PMP22 point mutation had clinical and electrophysiologic phenotypes that were similar to those of patients with the 1.5-Mb duplication. CONCLUSIONS: The PMP22 gene has a causative role in CMT type 1. Either a point mutation in PMP22 or a duplication of the region including the PMP22 gene can result in the disease phenotype.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejm199307083290205

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 333

Metadata

Authors
Roa, B. B., Garcia, C. A., Suter, U., Kulpa, D. A., Wise, C. A., Mueller, J., Welcher, A. A., Snipes, G. J., Shooter, E. M., Patel, P. I., & Lupski, J. R.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
1993-07-08
Volume
329
Issue
2
Pages
96-101
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2321918404
Cited by
333
References
1
FWCI
10.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease Type 1A -- Association with a Spontaneous Point Mutation in the PMP22 Gene. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm199307083290205
The paper
Roa, B. B., Garcia, C. A., Suter, U., Kulpa, D. A., Wise, C. A., Mueller, J., Welcher, A. A., Snipes, G. J., Shooter, E. M., Patel, P. I., & Lupski, J. R. (1993). Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease Type 1A -- Association with a Spontaneous Point Mutation in the PMP22 Gene. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199307083290205

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.