The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Prevalence and Magnitude of Perinatal Substance Exposures in California
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Perinatal substance exposure has been linked to many neonatal and obstetrical complications. There have been few population-based epidemiologic studies to identify the prevalence and demographic profiles associated with drugs, alcohol, and smoking during pregnancy. METHODS: We studied a fully probabilistic stratified-cluster sample to estimate the prevalence of perinatal substance exposures in California in 1992. Urine samples from 29,494 women presenting for delivery in 202 hospitals were coded and screened for toxins; the results of toxicology screening were later linked by code number to the subjects' demographic variables and their reported use of tobacco and prescribed drugs. Urinary toxicologic tests provide conservative estimates because they can detect only very recent substance use. RESULTS: The weighted prevalence for perinatal substance exposure was 5.16 percent for the use of one or more drugs, 6.72 percent for alcohol (analyzed independently), and 8.82 percent for self-reported smoking. The percentage of women testing positive for any drug, including alcohol, was 11.35 percent. Estimates for racial and ethnic groups varied widely. Black women had the highest prevalence of total drug use (14.22 percent), alcohol use (11.58 percent), cocaine use (7.79 percent), and tobacco use (20.12 percent). Most drug exposures occurred among white non-Hispanic and Hispanic women. White non-Hispanic women had the second highest prevalence rate for the use of one or more drugs (6.79 percent) and self-reported tobacco use (14.82 percent). Hispanic women had the second highest prevalence rate for alcohol (6.87 percent). CONCLUSIONS: In California in 1992, there were 67,361 estimated perinatal exposures to one or more drugs, including alcohol, and 52,346 self-reported exposures to tobacco. These findings have clinical and public health implications.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Toxicity of amphetamines: an update
Carvalho, M., Carmo, H., Costa, V. M., Capela, J. P., Pontes, H., Remião, F., Carvalho, F., & Bastos, M. D. L. (2012) · Archives of Toxicology · doi:10.1007/s00204-012-0815-5 · Cited by 431
Westover, A. N., McBride, S., & Haley, R. W. (2007) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.64.4.495 · Cited by 324
The Maternal Lifestyle Study: Drug Use by Meconium Toxicology and Maternal Self-Report
Lester, B. M., ElSohly, M., Wright, L. L., Smeriglio, V. L., Verter, J., Bauer, C. R., Shankaran, S., Bada, H. S., Walls, H. C., Huestis, M. A., et al. (2001) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.107.2.309 · Cited by 307
Low‐Birthweight Prevention Programs: The Enigma of Failure
Stevens‐Simon, C., & Orleans, M. (1999) · Birth · doi:10.1046/j.1523-536x.1999.00184.x · Cited by 82
Metadata
- Authors
- Vega, W. A., Kolody, B., Hwang, J., & Noble, A.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 1993-09-16
- Volume
- 329
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 850-854
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2337828484
- Cited by
- 187
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prevalence and Magnitude of Perinatal Substance Exposures in California. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm199309163291207
- The paper
- Vega, W. A., Kolody, B., Hwang, J., & Noble, A. (1993). Prevalence and Magnitude of Perinatal Substance Exposures in California. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199309163291207
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.