Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 288

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Replacement of the Aortic Root with a Pulmonary Autograft in Children and Young Adults with Aortic-Valve Disease

Kouchoukos, Nicholas T., Davila-Roman, Victor G., Spray, Thomas L., Murphy, Suzan F., Perrillo, Johanna B.·1994·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The optimal substitute for severely diseased aortic valves in children and young adults is unknown. The use of a mechanical prosthesis requires permanent treatment of the patient with anticoagulants and is associated with thromboembolic and hemorrhagic complications. Aortic-valve allografts and porcine bioprostheses, which do not necessitate anticoagulant therapy, may deteriorate and have limited durability. METHODS: We therefore evaluated the use of the autologous pulmonary valve (i.e., the patient's own pulmonary valve) and the adjacent pulmonary artery as a replacement for the aortic valve and aortic sinuses in 33 patients. Five of the patients were from 8 to 16 years of age, and 28 were from 20 to 47 years of age. The pulmonary valve and the main pulmonary artery were used to replace the diseased aortic valve and the adjacent aorta. The coronary arteries were detached from the aorta and implanted into the pulmonary artery. The pulmonary valve and artery were replaced with a cryopreserved pulmonary allograft. RESULTS: There were no deaths during follow-up of up to 48 months (mean, 21 months). There were no episodes of infective endocarditis, and no reoperations on the aortic root were necessary. Also, there was no evidence on echocardiography of progressive dilatation of the autografts. With color-flow Doppler imaging, 22 patients were found to have only trivial regurgitation or none, 9 patients to have mild regurgitation, and no patients to have moderate or severe regurgitation across the autograft at the most recent follow-up visit. The mean peak velocity of flow across the autograft was 1.3 m per second (upper limit of normal, 1.8), indicating the absence of stenosis. One patient required reoperation for stenosis of the pulmonary allograft. CONCLUSIONS: Although the pulmonary-autograft procedure is more complex than simple aortic-valve replacement, it has been safely applied in selected patients, including young adults. Intermediate follow-up indicates satisfactory function of the autografts, with no dilatation or progressive valvular regurgitation. Pulmonary-root autografts may thus be the best available substitute for diseased aortic valves in children and young adults.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejm199401063300101

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Kouchoukos, N. T., Davila-Roman, V. G., Spray, T. L., Murphy, S. F., & Perrillo, J. B.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
1994-01-06
Volume
330
Issue
1
Pages
1-6
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2338603083
Cited by
288
References
0
FWCI
29.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Replacement of the Aortic Root with a Pulmonary Autograft in Children and Young Adults with Aortic-Valve Disease. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm199401063300101
The paper
Kouchoukos, N. T., Davila-Roman, V. G., Spray, T. L., Murphy, S. F., & Perrillo, J. B. (1994). Replacement of the Aortic Root with a Pulmonary Autograft in Children and Young Adults with Aortic-Valve Disease. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199401063300101

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.