The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Surgical Rates and Operative Mortality for Open and Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Maryland
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Since 1989, laparoscopic cholecystectomy has been widely adopted as a treatment for gallstone disease. We analyzed the association between the introduction of this procedure and three variables: the rate at which cholecystectomy was performed in Maryland, the characteristics of patients undergoing cholecystectomy in routine clinical practice, and operative mortality. METHODS AND RESULTS: We used 1985-1992 hospital-discharge data from all 54 acute care hospitals in Maryland, to identify open and laparoscopic cholecystectomies, characteristics of patients undergoing these procedures, and deaths occurring during hospitalizations in which these procedures were performed. The annual rate of cholecystectomy, adjusted for age, rose from 1.69 per 1000 state residents in 1987-1989 to 2.17 per 1000 residents in 1992, an increase of 28 percent (P < 0.001). As compared with patients undergoing open cholecystectomy, patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy tended to be younger, less likely to have acute cholecystitis or a common-duct stone, and more likely to be white and have private health insurance or belong to a health maintenance organization (P < 0.001). Although the operative mortality associated with laparoscopic cholecystectomy was less than that with open cholecystectomy (adjusted odds ratio, 0.22; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.13 to 0.37) and the overall mortality rate for all cholecystectomies declined from 0.84 percent in 1989 to 0.56 percent in 1992, there was no significant change in the total number of cholecystectomy-related operative deaths because of the increase in the cholecystectomy rate. CONCLUSIONS: In Maryland, although the adoption of laparoscopic cholecystectomy has been accompanied by a 33 percent decrease in overall operative mortality per procedure, the total number of cholecystectomy-related deaths has not fallen because of a 28 percent increase in the total rate of cholecystectomy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Comorbidity measures for use with administrative data.
Elixhauser, A., Steiner, C., Harris, D. R., & Coffey, R. M. (1998) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-199801000-00004 · Cited by 9,921
Self-citationPronovost, P. J. (1999) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.281.14.1310 · Cited by 688
Laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy for patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis
Keus, F., de Jong, J., Gooszen, H. G., & Laarhoven, C. J. (2006) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd006231 · Cited by 616
Ren, C. J., Patterson, E., & Gagner, M. (2000) · Obesity Surgery · doi:10.1381/096089200321593715 · Cited by 600
Irritable bowel syndrome and surgery: A multivariable analysis☆
Longstreth, G. F., & Yao, J. F. (2004) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2004.02.020 · Cited by 248
Metadata
- Authors
- Steiner, C. A., Bass, E. B., Talamini, M. A., Pitt, H. A., & Steinberg, E. P.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 1994-02-10
- Volume
- 330
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 403-408
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2336020488
- Cited by
- 366
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 23.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Surgical Rates and Operative Mortality for Open and Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Maryland. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm199402103300607
- The paper
- Steiner, C. A., Bass, E. B., Talamini, M. A., Pitt, H. A., & Steinberg, E. P. (1994). Surgical Rates and Operative Mortality for Open and Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Maryland. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199402103300607
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.