The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Resistance to Activated Protein C as a Basis for Venous Thrombosis
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: In three families with various forms of venous thrombosis, we observed an apparently inherited poor response to the anticoagulant activated protein C (APC). The condition was due to a deficiency in a previously unrecognized anticoagulant factor that functioned as a cofactor to activated protein C. METHODS: We conducted the present study to determine the prevalence of resistance to APC in patients with venous thrombosis. We compared 104 consecutive patients with venous thrombosis confirmed by objective tests with 130 controls. In addition, 211 members of 34 families of persons with resistance to APC were studied. The anticoagulant response to APC was measured with a modified version of the activated partial-thromboplastin time test; the results were expressed as APC ratios. RESULTS: Forty-five percent of patients had a family history of thrombosis. A significant (P < 0.001) difference in APC ratios was observed between the controls and the patients with thrombosis. For 33 percent of patients, the APC ratio was below the 5th percentile of the control values, although the results of the family studies suggested that the prevalence of APC resistance may be even higher (approximately 40 percent) in the patients with thrombosis. The inherited nature of the defect was confirmed in a majority of cases, and the family studies suggested the mode of inheritance to be autosomal dominant. The thrombosis-free survival of APC-resistant family members was significantly less than that of non-APC-resistant family members. CONCLUSIONS: There was a high prevalence of APC resistance among young persons with a history of venous thrombosis, and this resistance appeared to be inherited as an autosomal dominant trait.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Kernan, W. N., Ovbiagele, B., Black, H. R., Bravata, D. M., Chimowitz, M. I., Ezekowitz, M. D., Fang, M. C., Fisher, M., Furie, K. L., Heck, D. V., et al. (2014) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/str.0000000000000024 · Cited by 5,170
Sacco, R. L., Adams, R., Albers, G., Alberts, M. J., Benavente, O., Furie, K., Goldstein, L. B., Gorelick, P., Halperin, J., Harbaugh, R., et al. (2006) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.0000199147.30016.74 · Cited by 1,873
Vandenbroucke, J. P., Koster, T., Rosendaal, F. R., Briët, E., Reitsma, P. H., & Bertina, R. M. (1994) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(94)90286-0 · Cited by 1,063
Long-Term, Low-Intensity Warfarin Therapy for the Prevention of Recurrent Venous Thromboembolism
Ridker, P. M., Goldhaber, S. Z., Danielson, E., Rosenberg, Y., Eby, C. S., Deitcher, S. R., Cushman, M., Moll, S., Kessler, C. M., Elliott, C. G., et al. (2003) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa035029 · Cited by 808
Vascular risk factors for Alzheimer’s disease:
Breteler, M. M. B. (2000) · Neurobiology of Aging · doi:10.1016/s0197-4580(99)00110-4 · Cited by 664
Metadata
- Authors
- Svensson, P. J., & Dahlback, B.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 1994-02-24
- Volume
- 330
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 517-522
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2328547014
- Cited by
- 1,102
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 72.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Resistance to Activated Protein C as a Basis for Venous Thrombosis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm199402243300801
- The paper
- Svensson, P. J., & Dahlback, B. (1994). Resistance to Activated Protein C as a Basis for Venous Thrombosis. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199402243300801
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.