Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 881

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Relation between Myocardial Blood Flow and the Severity of Coronary-Artery Stenosis

Open access
Uren, Neal G., Melin, Jacques A., De Bruyne, Bernard, Wijns, William, Baudhuin, Thierry, Camici, Paolo G.·1994·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We assessed the relation between the severity of stenosis in a coronary artery and the degree of impairment of myocardial blood flow. Studies in laboratory animals have shown that as the degree of coronary-artery stenosis increases, the maximal coronary flow measured after maximal vasodilation progressively decreases, with a concomitant decrease in basal flow. However, this relation has not been carefully documented in humans through measurement of myocardial blood flow. METHODS: We studied 35 patients with single-vessel coronary artery disease and normal left ventricular function and 21 age-matched controls. Regional myocardial blood flow in the area supplied by the stenosed artery was measured by positron-emission tomography with oxygen-15-labeled water while the subject was at rest (basal flow) and during hyperemia induced by the intravenous administration of the vasodilator adenosine (140 micrograms per kilogram of body weight per minute) or dipyridamole (0.56 mg per kilogram). RESULTS: The mean (+/- SD) basal myocardial blood flow was 1.14 +/- 0.42 ml per minute per gram of tissue in the patients and 1.13 +/- 0.26 ml per minute per gram in the controls; during hyperemia, myocardial flow was 2.10 +/- 1.16 and 3.37 +/- 1.25 ml per minute per gram (P < 0.001), respectively. Basal flow was unchanged regardless of the severity of stenosis, expressed as a percentage of the diameter of the affected vessel (range of degrees of stenosis, 17 to 87 percent). In contrast, flow during hyperemia correlated inversely and significantly with the degree of stenosis and correlated directly with the minimal luminal diameter. The coronary vasodilator reserve (defined as the ratio of flow during hyperemia to flow at base line) began to decline when the degree of stenosis was about 40 percent and approached unity when stenosis was 80 percent or greater. CONCLUSIONS: In humans, basal myocardial blood flow remains constant regardless of the severity of coronary-artery stenosis. However, during hyperemia, flow progressively decreases when the degree of stenosis is about 40 percent or more and does not differ significantly from basal flow when stenosis is 80 percent or greater.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejm199406233302503

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 881

Metadata

Authors
Uren, N. G., Melin, J. A., De Bruyne, B., Wijns, W., Baudhuin, T., & Camici, P. G.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
1994-06-23
Volume
330
Issue
25
Pages
1782-1788
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2039471471
Cited by
881
References
0
FWCI
26.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Relation between Myocardial Blood Flow and the Severity of Coronary-Artery Stenosis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm199406233302503
The paper
Uren, N. G., Melin, J. A., De Bruyne, B., Wijns, W., Baudhuin, T., & Camici, P. G. (1994). Relation between Myocardial Blood Flow and the Severity of Coronary-Artery Stenosis. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199406233302503

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.