Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 254

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Low-Dose Cyclosporine for the Treatment of Crohn's Disease

Feagan, Brian G., McDonald, John, Rochon, James, Laupacis, Andreas, Fedorak, Richard N., Kinnear, Douglas, Saibil, Fred, Groll, Aubrey, Archambault, Andre, Gillies, Richard, Valberg, Barbara, Irvine, E. Jan·1994·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Long-term corticosteroid therapy for Crohn's disease is associated with important types of morbidity, such as osteoporosis. Safe and effective alternative treatments are required. Although a short-term benefit of cyclosporine in active Crohn's disease has been suggested, the long-term safety and efficacy of this treatment have not been established. METHODS: We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled evaluation of the effect of 18 months of low-dose cyclosporine treatment on the course of Crohn's disease. Adult patients whose disease had been active within the previous two years were randomly assigned to receive cyclosporine (151 patients) or placebo (154 patients) in addition to their usual therapy. Randomization was stratified according to center and score on the Crohn's Disease Activity Index (193 patients had scores of 150 or less, and 112 had scores greater than 150). The primary outcome measure was clinically important worsening of Crohn's disease, defined as a 100-point increase in the Crohn's Disease Activity Index from the patient's base-line value. Secondary outcomes were the use of prednisone and 5-amino-salicylates, mean score on the Crohn's Disease Activity Index and mean quality-of-life score, and the need for surgery. RESULTS: The condition of more patients worsened with cyclosporine than with placebo (91 of 151, or 60.3 percent, vs. 80 of 154, or 51.9 percent; P = 0.10). The median time to worsening of disease in patients receiving cyclosporine was 338 days, as compared with 492 days in patients receiving placebo (P = 0.25; relative risk, 1.22; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.86 to 1.72). Analyses of the mean Crohn's Disease Activity Index and quality-of-life scores and of the use of prednisone and 5-aminosalicylates also failed to demonstrate benefit. CONCLUSIONS: In our patient population, the addition of low-dose cyclosporine to conventional treatment for Crohn's disease did not improve symptoms or reduce requirements for other forms of therapy.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejm199406303302602

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 254

Metadata

Authors
Feagan, B. G., McDonald, J., Rochon, J., Laupacis, A., Fedorak, R. N., Kinnear, D., Saibil, F., Groll, A., Archambault, A., Gillies, R., Valberg, B., & Irvine, E. J.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
1994-06-30
Volume
330
Issue
26
Pages
1846-1851
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2337873391
Cited by
254
References
0
FWCI
10.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Low-Dose Cyclosporine for the Treatment of Crohn's Disease. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm199406303302602
The paper
Feagan, B. G., McDonald, J., Rochon, J., Laupacis, A., Fedorak, R. N., Kinnear, D., Saibil, F., Groll, A., Archambault, A., Gillies, R., Valberg, B., & Irvine, E. J. (1994). Low-Dose Cyclosporine for the Treatment of Crohn's Disease. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199406303302602

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.