The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Neonatal Serologic Screening and Early Treatment for Congenital Toxoplasma gondii Infection
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Most infants with congenital Toxoplasma gondii infection have no symptoms at birth, but many will have retinal disease or neurologic abnormalities later in life. Early detection and treatment of congenital toxoplasmosis may reduce these sequelae. METHODS: In Massachusetts since January 1986, and in New Hampshire since July 1988, newborns have been screened for intrauterine infection with T. gondii by means of an IgM capture immunoassay of blood specimens routinely collected for screening for metabolic disorders. Congenital infection is confirmed by assays for specific IgG and IgM antibodies in serum from infants and their mothers. For this study, infants with serologic evidence of infection underwent extensive clinical evaluation and received one year of treatment. RESULTS: Through June 1992, 100 of 635,000 infants tested had positive screening tests. Congenital infection was confirmed in 52 infants, 50 of whom were identified only through neonatal screening and not through initial clinical examination. However, after the serologic results became available, more detailed examinations revealed abnormalities of either the central nervous system or the retina in 19 of 48 infants evaluated (40 percent). After treatment, only 1 of 46 children had a neurologic deficit (hemiplegia attributable to a cerebral lesion present at birth). Thirty-nine treated children had follow-up ophthalmologic examinations when one to six years old; four (10 percent) had eye lesions that may have developed postnatally (a macular lesion in one child and minor retinal scars in three). CONCLUSIONS: Routine neonatal screening for toxoplasmosis identifies congenital infections that are subclinical, and early treatment may reduce the severe long-term sequelae.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Thomas, M. K., Murray, R., Flockhart, L., Pintar, K., Pollari, F., Fazil, A., Nesbitt, A., & Marshall, B. (2013) · Foodborne Pathogens and Disease · doi:10.1089/fpd.2012.1389 · Cited by 440
Boyer, K. M., Holfels, E., Roizen, N., Swisher, C., Mack, D., Remington, J., Withers, S., Meier, P., McLeod, R., & the Toxoplasmosis Study Group (2005) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2004.07.031 · Cited by 275
Peters, P. J., Thigpen, M. C., Parise, M. E., & Newman, R. D. (2007) · Drug Safety · doi:10.2165/00002018-200730060-00003 · Cited by 174
Yamamoto, R., Ishii, K., Shimada, M., Hayashi, S., Hidaka, N., Nakayama, M., & Mitsuda, N. (2013) · Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research · doi:10.1111/j.1447-0756.2012.02012.x · Cited by 49
Metadata
- Authors
- Guerina, N. G., Hsu, H.-W., Meissner, H. C., Maguire, J. H., Lynfield, R., Stechenberg, B., Abroms, I., Pasternack, M. S., Hoff, R., Eaton, R. B., & Grady, G. F.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 1994-06-30
- Volume
- 330
- Issue
- 26
- Pages
- 1858-1863
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2095426609
- Cited by
- 505
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Neonatal Serologic Screening and Early Treatment for Congenital Toxoplasma gondii Infection. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm199406303302604
- The paper
- Guerina, N. G., Hsu, H.-W., Meissner, H. C., Maguire, J. H., Lynfield, R., Stechenberg, B., Abroms, I., Pasternack, M. S., Hoff, R., Eaton, R. B., & Grady, G. F. (1994). Neonatal Serologic Screening and Early Treatment for Congenital Toxoplasma gondii Infection. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199406303302604
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.