The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Transient Increase in the Risk of Breast Cancer after Giving Birth
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The effect of pregnancy on the risk of breast cancer is not clear. We tested the hypothesis that the risk of breast cancer increases transiently after pregnancy but then falls to a level below that of age-matched nulliparous women. METHODS: We conducted a case-control study of a nationwide cohort in Sweden, using a computerized record linkage between the Cancer Registry and the Fertility Registry. The study subjects were women born from 1925 through 1960 who were resident citizens of Sweden at the time of the 1960 census. A total of 12,666 patients with breast cancer were compared with 62,121 age-matched control subjects. We used conditional logistic regression to estimate odds ratios for the development of breast cancer at different ages, according to maternal age at first delivery (in uniparous as compared with nulliparous women) and age at second delivery (in biparous as compared with uniparous women). RESULTS: Uniparous women were at higher risk of breast cancer than nulliparous women for up to 15 years after childbirth and at lower risk thereafter. The excess risk was most pronounced among women who were older at the time of their first delivery (odds ratio 5 years after delivery among women 35 years old at first delivery, 1.26; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.10 to 1.44). Women who had two pregnancies had a less striking increase in risk. CONCLUSIONS: Pregnancy has a dual effect on the risk of breast cancer: it transiently increases the risk after childbirth but reduces the risk in later years. In women with two pregnancies, the short-term adverse effect is masked by the long-term protection imparted by the first pregnancy. A plausible biologic interpretation is that pregnancy increases the short-term risk of breast cancer by stimulating the growth of cells that have undergone the early stages of malignant transformation but that it confers long-term protection by inducing the differentiation of normal mammary stem cells that have the potential for neoplastic change.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Statistical Aspects of the Analysis of Data From Retrospective Studies of Disease
(1959) · JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/22.4.719 · Cited by 14,689
Cited by
Control of mammary stem cell function by steroid hormone signalling
Asselin-Labat, M.-L., Vaillant, F., Sheridan, J. M., Pal, B., Wu, D., Simpson, E. R., Yasuda, H., Smyth, G. K., Martin, T. J., Lindeman, G. J., et al. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09027 · Cited by 693
Pregnancy-associated breast cancer and metastasis
Schedin, P. (2006) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc1839 · Cited by 466
Risk of cancer after use of fertility drugs with in-vitro fertilisation
Venn, A., Watson, L., Bruinsma, F., Giles, G., & Healy, D. (1999) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(99)05203-4 · Cited by 371
Metadata
- Authors
- Lambe, M., Hsieh, C.-C., Trichopoulos, D., Ekbom, A., Pavia, M., & Adami, H.-O.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 1994-07-07
- Volume
- 331
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 5-9
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W1980294831
- Cited by
- 591
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Transient Increase in the Risk of Breast Cancer after Giving Birth. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm199407073310102
- The paper
- Lambe, M., Hsieh, C.-C., Trichopoulos, D., Ekbom, A., Pavia, M., & Adami, H.-O. (1994). Transient Increase in the Risk of Breast Cancer after Giving Birth. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199407073310102
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.