The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Economic Impact of Multiple-Gestation Pregnancies and the Contribution of Assisted-Reproduction Techniques to Their Incidence
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Although the medical complications associated with multiple-gestation pregnancies have been well documented, little is known about the effects of such pregnancies on the use of health care resources and the associated costs. This is an important issue because of the increasing use of assisted-reproduction techniques, which commonly result in multiple-gestation pregnancies. METHODS: We determined hospital charges and the use of assisted-reproduction techniques (such as induction of ovulation, in vitro fertilization, and gamete intrafallopian transfer) for 13,206 pregnant women (11,986 with singleton pregnancies, 1135 with twin pregnancies, and 85 with more than two fetuses) who were admitted for delivery to Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, in 1986 through 1991 and their 14,033 neonates (11,671 singletons, 2144 twins, and 218 resulting from higher-order multiple gestations). RESULTS: After we controlled for variables known to affect hospital charges, the predicted total charges to the family in 1991 for a singleton delivery were $9,845, as compared with $37,947 for twins ($18,974 per baby) and $109,765 for triplets ($36,588 per baby). Assisted-reproduction techniques were used in 2 percent of singleton, 35 percent of twin, and 77 percent of higher-order multiple-gestation pregnancies; such procedures were approximately equally divided between induction of ovulation alone and in vitro fertilization or gamete intrafallopian transfer. CONCLUSIONS: Multiple-gestation pregnancies, a high proportion of which result from the use of assisted-reproduction techniques, dramatically increase hospital charges. If all the multiple gestations resulting from assisted-reproduction techniques, dramatically increase hospital charges. If all the multiple gestations resulting from assisted-reproduction techniques had been singleton pregnancies, the predicted savings to the health care delivery system in the study hospital alone would have been over $3 million per year. Although assisted reproduction provides tremendous benefits to families with infertility, the increased medical risks entailed by multiple-gestation pregnancies and the associated costs cannot be ignored. We suggest that more attention be paid to approaches to infertility that reduce the likelihood of multiple gestation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Smearing Estimate: A Nonparametric Retransformation Method
Duan, N. (1983) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1983.10478017 · Cited by 2,232
Luke, B., & Keith, L. G. (1992) · PubMed · Cited by 247
Recent trends in the incidence of multiple births and associated mortality.
Botting, B., Davies, I. M., & Macfarlane, A. (1987) · Archives of Disease in Childhood · doi:10.1136/adc.62.9.941 · Cited by 209
Multiple pregnancies following induction of ovulation
Wallach, E. E., Schenker, J. G., Yarkoni, S., & Granat, M. (1981) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)45308-2 · Cited by 164
LEVENE, M. I., WILD, J., & STEER, P. (1992) · BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.1992.tb13831.x · Cited by 160
Martin, K. A., Hall, J. E., Adams, J. M., & Crowley, W. F. (1993) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jcem.77.1.8325934 · Cited by 147
Self-citationThe improving outcome of triplet pregnancies
Lipitz, S., Reichman, B. L., Paret, G., Modan, M., Shalev, J., Serr, D. M., Mashiach, S., & Frenkel, Y. (1989) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/0002-9378(89)90683-2 · Cited by 135
Selective reduction of multifetal pregnancies
Wapner, R. J. (1990) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/0140-6736(90)90550-o · Cited by 127
Outpatient triplet management: A contemporary review
Newman, R., Hamer, C., & Miller, M. C. (1989) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/0002-9378(89)90354-2 · Cited by 123
Cited by
Neal, K. R., Hebden, J., & Spiller, R. (1997) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.314.7083.779 · Cited by 586
Manipulation of Human Ovarian Function: Physiological Concepts and Clinical Consequences*
Fauser, B. C. J. M., & van Heusden, A. M. (1997) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/edrv.18.1.0290 · Cited by 509
Goverde, A. J., McDonnell, J., Vermeiden, J. P., Schats, R., Rutten, F. F., & Schoemaker, J. (2000) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(99)04002-7 · Cited by 453
Reducing the Risk of Multiple Births by Transfer of Two Embryos after in Vitro Fertilization
Templeton, A., & Morris, J. K. (1998) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199808273390901 · Cited by 391
Insurance Coverage and Outcomes of in Vitro Fertilization
Jain, T., Harlow, B. L., & Hornstein, M. D. (2002) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmsa013491 · Cited by 310
Metadata
- Authors
- Callahan, T. L., Hall, J. E., Ettner, S. L., Christiansen, C. L., Greene, M. F., & Crowley, W. F.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 1994-07-28
- Volume
- 331
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 244-249
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2324042681
- Cited by
- 426
- References
- 23
- FWCI
- 21.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Economic Impact of Multiple-Gestation Pregnancies and the Contribution of Assisted-Reproduction Techniques to Their Incidence. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm199407283310407
- The paper
- Callahan, T. L., Hall, J. E., Ettner, S. L., Christiansen, C. L., Greene, M. F., & Crowley, W. F. (1994). The Economic Impact of Multiple-Gestation Pregnancies and the Contribution of Assisted-Reproduction Techniques to Their Incidence. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199407283310407
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.