The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Comparison of Intravaginal Misoprostol with Prostaglandin E2for Termination of Second-Trimester Pregnancy
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: The most widely used medical method of terminating second-trimester pregnancy is the intravaginal administration of prostaglandin E2 (dinoprostone [PGE2]). This treatment is highly effective but is associated with severe gastrointestinal side effects and hyperpyrexia. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, randomized trial comparing the efficacy and safety of misoprostol, a prostaglandin E1 analogue (200 micrograms intravaginally every 12 hours), with the efficacy and safety of PGE2 (20 mg intravaginally every 3 hours). The study population included 55 pregnant women between 12 and 22 weeks' gestation who were undergoing termination of pregnancy for either intrauterine fetal death (37 women) or medical or genetic reasons (18 women). RESULTS: The rate of successful abortions within 24 hours was 81 percent (22 of 27 women) with PGE2 and 89 percent (25 of 28 women) with misoprostol (P = 0.47). All the women who received misoprostol had successful abortions within 38 hours. Among those who had an abortion within 24 hours, the mean interval from treatment to abortion was similar in both groups (10.6 hours with PGE2 and 12.0 hours with misoprostol, P = 0.33). The rate of complete abortion, defined as the passage of the fetus and the placenta simultaneously, was 32 percent for PGE2 and 43 percent for misoprostol (P = 0.56). Certain side effects were more frequent in the women receiving PGE2 than in those receiving misoprostol: pyrexia (63 percent vs. 11 percent; P < 0.001), uterine pain (67 percent vs. 57 percent, P = 0.58), vomiting (33 percent vs. 4 percent, P = 0.005), and diarrhea (30 percent vs. 4 percent, P = 0.012). The average cost per treatment was $315.30 for PGE2, as compared with $0.97 for misoprostol. CONCLUSIONS: Misoprostol is at least as effective as PGE2 for the termination of second-trimester pregnancy involving either a dead or a living fetus, but it is less costly, is easier to administer, and is associated with fewer adverse effects.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
ESC Guidelines on the management of cardiovascular diseases during pregnancy
Endorsed by the European Society of Gynecology (ESG), T. A. F. E. P. C. (., Authors/Task Force Members, Regitz-Zagrosek, V., Blomstrom Lundqvist, C., Borghi, C., Cifkova, R., Ferreira, R., Foidart, J.-M., Gibbs, J. S. R., Gohlke-Baerwolf, C., et al. (2011) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehr218 · Cited by 1,924
Contradicted and Initially Stronger Effects in Highly Cited Clinical Research
Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2005) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.294.2.218 · Cited by 1,465
Early Pregnancy Termination with Mifepristone and Misoprostol in the United States
Spitz, I. M., Bardin, C. W., Benton, L., & Robbins, A. (1998) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199804303381801 · Cited by 441
Why consider vaginal drug administration?
Alexander, N. J., Baker, E., Kaptein, M., Karck, U., Miller, L., & Zampaglione, E. (2004) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.01.025 · Cited by 269
Intra-amniotic digoxin for feticide between 21 and 30 weeks of gestation: a prospective study
Sharvit, M., Klein, Z., Silber, M., Pomeranz, M., Agizim, R., Schonman, R., & Fishman, A. (2019) · BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/1471-0528.15640 · Cited by 27
Metadata
- Authors
- Jain, J. K., & Mishell, D. R.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 1994-08-04
- Volume
- 331
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 290-293
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2053001812
- Cited by
- 200
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Comparison of Intravaginal Misoprostol with Prostaglandin E2for Termination of Second-Trimester Pregnancy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm199408043310502
- The paper
- Jain, J. K., & Mishell, D. R. (1994). A Comparison of Intravaginal Misoprostol with Prostaglandin E2for Termination of Second-Trimester Pregnancy. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199408043310502
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.