The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Comparison of Cabergoline and Bromocriptine in the Treatment of Hyperprolactinemic Amenorrhea
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Cabergoline is a long-acting dopamine-agonist drug that suppresses prolactin secretion and restores gonadal function in women with hyperprolactinemic amenorrhea. We designed a study to compare its safety and efficacy with those of bromocriptine, which has been the standard therapy. METHODS: A total of 459 women with hyperprolactinemic amenorrhea were treated with either cabergoline (0.5 to 1.0 mg twice weekly) or bromocriptine (2.5 to 5.0 mg twice daily), administered in a double-blind fashion for 8 weeks and subsequently in an open fashion for 16 weeks, during which adjustments in the dose were made according to the response. Of the 459 women, 279 had microprolactinomas, 3 had macroprolactinomas, 1 had a craniopharyngioma, 167 had idiopathic hyperprolactinemia, and the remainder had an empty sella. Clinical and biochemical status was assessed at 2-week intervals for 8 weeks and monthly thereafter for a total of 6 months, with an additional assessment at 14 weeks. RESULTS: Stable normoprolactinemia was achieved in 186 of the 223 women treated with cabergoline (83 percent) and 138 of the 236 women treated with bromocriptine (59 percent, P < 0.001). Seventy-two percent of the women treated with cabergoline and 52 percent of those treated with bromocriptine had ovulatory cycles or became pregnant during treatment (P < 0.001). Amenorrhea persisted in 7 percent of the cabergoline-treated women and 16 percent of the bromocriptine-treated women. Adverse effects were recorded in 68 percent of the women taking cabergoline and 78 percent of those taking bromocriptine (P = 0.03); 3 percent discontinued taking cabergoline, and 12 percent stopped taking bromocriptine (P < 0.001) because of drug intolerance. Gastrointestinal symptoms were significantly less frequent, less severe, and shorter-lived in the women treated with cabergoline. CONCLUSIONS: Cabergoline is more effective and better tolerated than bromocriptine in women with hyperprolactinemic amenorrhea.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Maximum utilization of the life table method in analyzing survival
Cutler, S. J., & Ederer, F. (1958) · Journal of Chronic Diseases · doi:10.1016/0021-9681(58)90126-7 · Cited by 2,870
Statistical methods in cancer research. Vol. 1. The analysis of case-control studies
(1983) · Food and Chemical Toxicology · doi:10.1016/0278-6915(83)90281-8 · Cited by 1,716
“Proving the null hypothesis” in clinical trials
Blackwelder, W. C. (1982) · Controlled Clinical Trials · doi:10.1016/0197-2456(82)90024-1 · Cited by 887
Drugs Five Years Later: Bromocriptine
VANCE, M. L., EVANS, W. S., & THORNER, M. O. (1984) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-100-1-78 · Cited by 242
Cabergoline in the long-term therapy of hyperprolactinemic disorders
Ferrari, C., PARACCHI, A., MATTEI, A. M., de Vincentiis, S., D'Alberton, A., & Crosignani, P. (1992) · European Journal of Endocrinology · doi:10.1530/acta.0.1260489 · Cited by 146
Self-citationCox, D. R., & Snell, E. J. (1990) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2531476 · Cited by 129
Ferrari, C. I., BARBIERI, C., CALDARA, R., MUCCI, M., CODECASA, F., PARACCHI, A., Romano, C., Boghen, M. F., & Dubini, A. (1986) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jcem-63-4-941 · Cited by 127
Self-citationCICCARELLI, E., Giusti, M., Miola, C., POTENZONI, F., Sghedoni, D., Camanni, F., & Giordano, G. (1989) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jcem-69-4-725 · Cited by 86
Sample size graphs for “proving the null hypothesis”
Blackwelder, W. C., & Chang, M. A. (1984) · Controlled Clinical Trials · doi:10.1016/0197-2456(84)90116-8 · Cited by 76
Webster, J., Piscitelli, G., Polli, A., D'Alberton, A., Falsetti, L., Ferrari, C. I., FIORETTI, P., Giordano, G., L'Hermite, M., CICCARELLI, E., et al. (1992) · Clinical Endocrinology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2265.1992.tb01485.x · Cited by 72
Self-citation
Cited by
Diagnosis and treatment of hyperprolactinemia: an Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline
Melmed, S., Casanueva, F. F., Hoffman, A. R., Kleinberg, D. L., Montori, V. M., Schlechte, J. A., & Wass, J. A. H. (2011) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jc.2010-1692 · Cited by 1,844
Diagnosis and Management of Infertility: A Review
Carson, S. A., & Kallen, A. N. (2021) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2021.4788 · Cited by 1,294
Frank, M. J., & O'Reilly, R. C. (2006) · Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.1037/0735-7044.120.3.497 · Cited by 472
De Rosa, M., Ciccarelli, A., Zarrilli, S., Guerra, E., Gaccione, M., Di Sarno, A., Lombardi, G., & Colao, A. (2006) · Clinical Endocrinology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2265.2006.02461.x · Cited by 76
Prolactin in Human Reproduction
Molitch, M. E. (2009) · Yen & Jaffe's Reproductive Endocrinology · doi:10.1016/b978-1-4160-4907-4.00003-6 · Cited by 31
Metadata
- Authors
- Webster, J., Piscitelli, G., Polli, A., Ferrari, C. I., Ismail, I., & Scanlon, M. F.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 1994-10-06
- Volume
- 331
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- 904-909
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2040892630
- Cited by
- 699
- References
- 13
- FWCI
- 10.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Comparison of Cabergoline and Bromocriptine in the Treatment of Hyperprolactinemic Amenorrhea. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm199410063311403
- The paper
- Webster, J., Piscitelli, G., Polli, A., Ferrari, C. I., Ismail, I., & Scanlon, M. F. (1994). A Comparison of Cabergoline and Bromocriptine in the Treatment of Hyperprolactinemic Amenorrhea. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199410063311403
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.