Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 188

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Response of Symptomatic Neurosyphilis to High-Dose Intravenous Penicillin G in Patients with Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection

Open access
Gordon, Steven M., Eaton, Molly E., George, Rob, Larsen, Sandra, Lukehart, Sheila A., Kuypers, Jane, Marra, Christina M., Thompson, Sumner·1994·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Infection with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) may affect both the natural course of syphilis and the response to treatment. We examined the response to treatment with high-dose penicillin G in HIV-infected patients with symptomatic neurosyphilis. METHODS: Neurosyphilis was defined by reactivity in serum treponemal tests for syphilis, neurologic manifestations consistent with neurosyphilis, and a positive Venereal Disease Research Laboratory (VDRL) test on cerebrospinal fluid. We identified 11 HIV-infected patients with symptomatic neurosyphilis; 5 had been treated previously for early syphilis with penicillin G benzathine. Patients were treated with 18 million to 24 million units of penicillin G per day administered intravenously for 10 days. Cerebrospinal fluid was examined approximately 6 and 24 weeks after treatment, when the polymerase chain reaction and rabbit inoculation were used to detect Treponema pallidum. RESULTS: In four of the seven patients studied 24 weeks after treatment, the serum titers on rapid plasma reagin (RPR) testing decreased by at least two doubling dilutions, and four patients had reductions in the cerebrospinal fluid titers on VDRL testing or reverted to nonreactive results. In two patients there was no normalization or improvement in serum titers on RPR testing or cerebrospinal fluid titers on VDRL testing, cell counts, or protein concentrations. One patient relapsed with meningovascular syphilis six months after therapy. T. pallidum was detected by the polymerase chain reaction in cerebrospinal fluid from 3 of 10 patients before treatment, but in none of the 10 post-treatment specimens. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with early syphilis who are also infected with HIV, therapy with penicillin G benzathine may fail, and neurosyphilis may develop. The regimen of high-dose penicillin recommended for neurosyphilis is not consistently effective in patients infected with HIV.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejm199412013312201

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 188

Metadata

Authors
Gordon, S. M., Eaton, M. E., George, R., Larsen, S., Lukehart, S. A., Kuypers, J., Marra, C. M., & Thompson, S.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
1994-12
Volume
331
Issue
22
Pages
1469-1473
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2323588299
Cited by
188
References
2
FWCI
7.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Response of Symptomatic Neurosyphilis to High-Dose Intravenous Penicillin G in Patients with Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm199412013312201
The paper
Gordon, S. M., Eaton, M. E., George, R., Larsen, S., Lukehart, S. A., Kuypers, J., Marra, C. M., & Thompson, S. (1994). The Response of Symptomatic Neurosyphilis to High-Dose Intravenous Penicillin G in Patients with Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199412013312201

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.