The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Complications and Failures of Subclavian-Vein Catheterization
Open accessAbstract
Although catheterization of the subclavian vein is a common procedure, the risk factors for complications and failures, with the exception of the physician's experience, are poorly understood. Ultrasonography has been recommended to help guide the placement of central venous catheters.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Management of venous port systems in oncology: a review of current evidence
Vescia, S., Baumgärtner, A. K., Jacobs, V. R., Kiechle-Bahat, M., Rody, A., Loibl, S., & Harbeck, N. (2008) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdm272 · Cited by 264
Metadata
- Authors
- Mansfield, P. F., Hohn, D. C., Fornage, B. D., Gregurich, M. A., & Ota, D. M.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 1994-12-29
- Volume
- 331
- Issue
- 26
- Pages
- 1735-1738
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W4237722346
- Cited by
- 713
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 25.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Complications and Failures of Subclavian-Vein Catheterization. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm199412293312602
- The paper
- Mansfield, P. F., Hohn, D. C., Fornage, B. D., Gregurich, M. A., & Ota, D. M. (1994). Complications and Failures of Subclavian-Vein Catheterization. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199412293312602
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
