The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Induction of Abortion with Mifepristone (RU 486) and Oral or Vaginal Misoprostol
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Medical termination of pregnancy can be successfully performed with a combination of mifepristone (RU 486) and a prostaglandin analogue. We conducted a prospective, randomized trial to compare oral with vaginal administration of the prostaglandin E1 analogue misoprostol for first-trimester abortion in women treated initially with mifepristone. METHODS: The study population consisted of 270 women seeking abortion within 63 days after the onset of amenorrhea. The dose of mifepristone was 600 mg, and the dose of misoprostol was 800 micrograms. The study had two primary end points: expulsion of the conceptus without the need for a surgical procedure, and abortion within four hours after the administration of misoprostol. RESULTS: Expulsion of the conceptus without the need for a surgical procedure occurred in 95 percent of the women who received misoprostol vaginally and in 87 percent of those who received it orally (P = 0.03). The rate of continued pregnancy was 7 percent with the oral regimen and 1 percent with the vaginal regimen (P = 0.01). Ninety-three percent of the women receiving misoprostol vaginally had abortions within four hours, as compared with only 78 percent of the women receiving the drug orally (P < 0.001). Vomiting and diarrhea were reported more frequently by the women who received oral misoprostol than by those who received vaginal misoprostol (P = 0.04 and P = 0.002, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: After the administration of mifepristone, vaginal administration of misoprostol is more effective and better tolerated than oral administration for the induction of first-trimester abortion.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Pharmacokinetics of different routes of administration of misoprostol
Tang, O. S. (2002) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/17.2.332 · Cited by 490
Early Pregnancy Termination with Mifepristone and Misoprostol in the United States
Spitz, I. M., Bardin, C. W., Benton, L., & Robbins, A. (1998) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199804303381801 · Cited by 441
Trinder, J., Brocklehurst, P., Porter, R., Read, M., Vyas, S., & Smith, L. (2006) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.38828.593125.55 · Cited by 299
Bagratee, J. S. (2004) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/deh049 · Cited by 165
Chung, T. K. H., Lee, D. T. S., Cheung, L. P., Haines, C. J., & Chang, A. M. Z. (1999) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(99)00128-4 · Cited by 122
Metadata
- Authors
- El-Refaey, H., Rajasekar, D., Abdalla, M., Calder, L., & Templeton, A.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 1995-04-13
- Volume
- 332
- Issue
- 15
- Pages
- 983-987
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2321688437
- Cited by
- 387
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 17.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Induction of Abortion with Mifepristone (RU 486) and Oral or Vaginal Misoprostol. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm199504133321502
- The paper
- El-Refaey, H., Rajasekar, D., Abdalla, M., Calder, L., & Templeton, A. (1995). Induction of Abortion with Mifepristone (RU 486) and Oral or Vaginal Misoprostol. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199504133321502
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.