Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 908

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Optimal Oral Anticoagulant Therapy in Patients with Mechanical Heart Valves

Open access
Cannegieter, S.C., Rosendaal, F.R., Wintzen, A.R., van der Meer, F.J.M., Vandenbroucke, J.P., Briet, E.·1995·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The optimal intensity of oral anticoagulant therapy for patients with mechanical heart valves (i.e., the level at which thromboembolic complications are effectively prevented without excessive bleeding) is not known. We attempted to determine the optimal intensity by calculating the incidence of both complications at different levels of anticoagulation. METHODS: Data were collected on all patients with mechanical heart valves who have been seen at four regional Dutch anticoagulation clinics since 1985. The primary outcome events were episodes of thromboembolism or major bleeding. The intensity-specific incidence of each type of event was calculated as the number of events that occurred at a certain intensity of anticoagulation (expressed in terms of the international normalized ratio [INR]) divided by the number of patient-years during which the INR was at this level in the total patient population. RESULTS: A total of 1608 patients were followed during 6475 patient-years. Cerebral embolism occurred in 43 patients (0.68 per 100 patient-years) and peripheral embolism in 2 (0.03 per 100 patient-years). Intracranial and spinal bleeding occurred in 36 patients (0.57 per 100 patient-years) and major extracranial bleeding in 128 (2.1 per 100 patient-years). The optimal intensity of anticoagulation, at which the incidence of both complications was lowest, was achieved when the INR was between 2.5 and 4.9. CONCLUSIONS: The intensity of anticoagulant therapy for patients with prosthetic heart valves is optimal when the INR is between 2.5 and 4.9. To achieve this level of anticoagulation, a target INR of 3.0 to 4.0 is recommended.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejm199507063330103

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 908

Metadata

Authors
Cannegieter, S. C., Rosendaal, F. R., Wintzen, A. R., van der Meer, F. J. M., Vandenbroucke, J. P., & Briet, E.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
1995-07-06
Volume
333
Issue
1
Pages
11-17
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2004337162
Cited by
908
References
0
FWCI
25.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Optimal Oral Anticoagulant Therapy in Patients with Mechanical Heart Valves. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm199507063330103
The paper
Cannegieter, S. C., Rosendaal, F. R., Wintzen, A. R., van der Meer, F. J. M., Vandenbroucke, J. P., & Briet, E. (1995). Optimal Oral Anticoagulant Therapy in Patients with Mechanical Heart Valves. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199507063330103

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.