Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 236

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Performance Reports on Quality -- Prototypes, Problems, and Prospects

Epstein, Arnold·1995·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

In recent years, it seemed that regular performance reports on the quality of health care would soon be de facto if not de jure national policy. Several states established statewide reporting systems for hospitals. Voluntary coalitions of employers and health plans developed performance-report prototypes and began pilot testing. The Clinton administration's proposal for comprehensive health care reform1 and those of its competitors -- proposals from Representative Jim Cooper (D-Tenn.) and Senator John Chafee (R-R.I.) -- included provisions for federally mandated reports on quality.Comprehensive health care reform in the United States is now dead. The prospect of a national reporting . . .

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejm199507063330114

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 236

Metadata

Authors
Epstein, A.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
1995-07-06
Volume
333
Issue
1
Pages
57-61
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2034329620
Cited by
236
References
0
FWCI
98.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Performance Reports on Quality -- Prototypes, Problems, and Prospects. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm199507063330114
The paper
Epstein, A. (1995). Performance Reports on Quality -- Prototypes, Problems, and Prospects. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199507063330114

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.