The DOI matches its Crossref record.
An Epidemiologic Study of Lyme Disease in Southern Sweden
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Lyme disease is the most common vector-borne infection in some temperate regions of the Northern Hemisphere. However, for most areas of endemic disease reliable epidemiologic data are sparse. METHODS: Over a one-year period, we conducted a prospective, population-based survey of cases of Lyme disease in southern Sweden. The diagnosis was made on the basis of the presence of erythema migrans at least 5 cm in diameter or characteristic clinical manifestations such as arthritis, neuroborreliosis, and carditis. RESULTS: We identified 1471 patients with Lyme disease, for an overall annual incidence of 69 cases per 100,000 inhabitants. The incidence varied markedly according to geographic region, and there were several areas where disease was widely prevalent. The incidence varied according to age, with the highest rates among people 5 to 9 and 60 to 74 years of age, but not according to sex. The most frequent clinical manifestation was erythema migrans (seen in 77 percent of all cases), followed by neuroborreliosis (16 percent) and arthritis (7 percent). Carditis was rare. A preceding tick bite was reported by 79 percent of the patients. Bites in the head and neck region were more common among children than among adults and were associated with an increased risk of neuroborreliosis. CONCLUSIONS: Lyme disease is very common in southern Sweden, with a relatively high frequency of neurologic complications and arthritis. With the exception of the low incidence of carditis, the pattern of disease we found in Sweden was similar to that reported in the United States.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Climate change and infectious diseases in Europe
Semenza, J. C., & Menne, B. (2009) · The Lancet Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1016/s1473-3099(09)70104-5 · Cited by 679
Lindgren, E., Tälleklint, L., & Polfeldt, T. (2000) · Environmental Health Perspectives · doi:10.1289/ehp.00108119 · Cited by 567
Mead, P. S. (2015) · Infectious Disease Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.idc.2015.02.010 · Cited by 441
Tick-borne encephalitis in Sweden and climate change
Lindgren, E., & Gustafson, R. (2001) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(00)05250-8 · Cited by 387
Gender differences in skin: A review of the literature
Dao, H., & Kazin, R. A. (2007) · Gender Medicine · doi:10.1016/s1550-8579(07)80061-1 · Cited by 199
Metadata
- Authors
- Berglund, J., Eitrem, R., Ornstein, K., Lindberg, A., Ringnér, Å., Elmrud, H., Carlsson, M., Runehagen, A., Svanborg, C., & Norrby, R.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 1995-11-16
- Volume
- 333
- Issue
- 20
- Pages
- 1319-1324
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2324630307
- Cited by
- 437
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An Epidemiologic Study of Lyme Disease in Southern Sweden. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm199511163332004
- The paper
- Berglund, J., Eitrem, R., Ornstein, K., Lindberg, A., Ringnér, Å., Elmrud, H., Carlsson, M., Runehagen, A., Svanborg, C., & Norrby, R. (1995). An Epidemiologic Study of Lyme Disease in Southern Sweden. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199511163332004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.