The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Effects of Radiotherapy and Surgery in Early Breast Cancer — An Overview of the Randomized Trials
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Randomized trials of radiotherapy and surgery for early breast cancer may have been too small to detect differences in long-term survival and recurrence reliably. We therefore performed a systematic overview (meta-analysis) of the results of such trials. METHODS: Information was sought on each subject from investigators who conducted trials that began before 1985 and that compared local therapies for early breast cancer. Data on mortality were available from 36 trials comparing radiotherapy plus surgery with the same type of surgery alone, 10 comparing more extensive surgery with less extensive surgery, and 18 comparing more extensive surgery with less extensive surgery plus radiotherapy. Information on mortality was available for 28,405 women (97.4 percent of the 29,175 women in the trials). RESULTS: The addition of radiotherapy to surgery resulted in a rate of local recurrence that was three times lower than the rate with surgery alone, but there was no significant difference in 10-year survival; among a total of 17,273 women enrolled in such trials, mortality was 40.3 percent with radiotherapy and 41.4 percent without radiotherapy (P = 0.3). Radiotherapy was associated with a reduced risk of death due to breast cancer (odds ratio, 0.94; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.88 to 1.00; P = 0.03), which indicates that, after 10 years, there would be about 0 to 5 fewer deaths due to breast cancer per 100 women. However, there was an increased risk of death from other causes (odds ratio, 1.24; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.09 to 1.42; P = 0.002). This, together with the age-specific death rates, implies, after 10 years, a few extra deaths not due to breast cancer per 100 older women or per 1000 younger women. During the first decade or two after diagnosis, the excess in the rate of such deaths that was associated with radiotherapy was much greater women who were over 60 years of age at randomization (15.3 percent vs. 11.1 percent [339 vs. 249 deaths]) than among those under 50 (2.5 percent vs. 2.0 percent [62 vs. 49 deaths]). Breast-conserving surgery involved some risk of recurrence in the remaining tissue, but no significant differences in overall survival at 10 years were found in the studies of mastectomy versus breast-conserving surgery plus radiotherapy (4891 women), more extensive surgery versus less extensive surgery (4818 women), or axillary clearance versus radiotherapy as adjuncts to mastectomy (4370 women). CONCLUSIONS: Some of the local therapies for breast cancer had substantially different effects on the rates of local recurrence--such as the reduced recurrence with the addition of radiotherapy to surgery--but there were no definite differences in overall survival at 10 years.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 14
- 1992, Lancet, 339, 1
- 10.1056/NEJM198812293192601 · DOI · Paper page
- Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group. Treatment of early breast cancer: worldwide evidence 1985–1990. Vol. 1. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press, 1990.
- Cuzick J, 1987, Cancer Treat Rep, 71, 15
- Cuzick J, 1994, J Clin Oncol, 12, 447, 10.1200/JCO.1994.12.3.447 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/bjc.1976.220 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/bjc.1977.1 · DOI · Paper page
- Clarke MJ, 1994, BMJ, 309, 1007, 10.1136/bmj.309.6960.1007 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/0360-3016(86)90029-5 · DOI
- 10.1136/bmj.298.6688.1611 · DOI
- Gelman R, 1990, J Clin Oncol, 8, 548, 10.1200/JCO.1990.8.3.548 · DOI
- 10.1016/0140-6736(91)90475-5 · DOI
- Hayward J, 1987, Arch Surg, 122, 1244, 10.1001/archsurg.1987.01400230030004 · DOI
- 10.1056/NEJM199511303332203 · DOI
Cited by
Fisher, B., Anderson, S., Bryant, J., Margolese, R. G., Deutsch, M., Fisher, E. R., Jeong, J.-H., & Wolmark, N. (2002) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa022152 · Cited by 6,249
Lung adjuvant cisplatin evaluation: a pooled analysis by the LACE Collaborative Group.
Pignon, J.-P., Tribodet, H., Scagliotti, G. V., Douillard, J.-Y., Shepherd, F. A., Stephens, R. J., Dunant, A., Torri, V., Rosell, R., Seymour, L., et al. (2008) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2007.13.9030 · Cited by 2,642
Darby, S. C., McGale, P., Taylor, C. W., & Peto, R. (2005) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(05)70251-5 · Cited by 1,049
(2001) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(01)06409-1 · Cited by 870
Metadata
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 1995-11-30
- Volume
- 333
- Issue
- 22
- Pages
- 1444-1456
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W4293107555
- Cited by
- 1,012
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of Radiotherapy and Surgery in Early Breast Cancer — An Overview of the Randomized Trials. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm199511303332202
- The paper
- Effects of Radiotherapy and Surgery in Early Breast Cancer — An Overview of the Randomized Trials. (1995). New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199511303332202
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.