Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 2,439

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Autologous Bone Marrow Transplantation as Compared with Salvage Chemotherapy in Relapses of Chemotherapy-Sensitive Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma

Philip, Thierry, Guglielmi, Cesare, Hagenbeek, Anton, Somers, Renier, Van Der Lelie, Hans, Bron, Dominique, Sonneveld, Pieter, Gisselbrecht, Christian, Cahn, Jean-Yves, Harousseau, Jean-Luc, Coiffier, Bertrand, Biron, Pierre, Mandelli, Franco, Chauvin, Franck·1995·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: High-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous bone marrow transplantation is a therapeutic option for patients with chemotherapy-sensitive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma who have relapses. In this report we describe a prospective randomized study of such treatment. METHOD: A total of 215 patients with relapses of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma were treated between July 1987 and June 1994. All patients received two courses of conventional chemotherapy. The 109 patients who had a response to chemotherapy were randomly assigned to receive four courses of chemotherapy plus radiotherapy (54 patients) or radiotherapy plus intensive chemotherapy and autologous bone marrow transplantation (55 patients). RESULTS: The overall rate of response to conventional chemotherapy was 58 percent; among patients with relapses after chemotherapy, the response rate was 64 percent, and among those with relapses during chemotherapy, the response rate was 21 percent. There were three deaths from toxic effects among the patients in the transplantation group, and none among those in the group receiving chemotherapy without transplantation. The two groups did not differ in terms of prognostic factors. The median follow-up time was 63 months. The response rate was 84 percent after bone marrow transplantation and 44 percent after chemotherapy without transplantation. At five years, the rate of event-free survival was 46 percent in the transplantation group and 12 percent in the group receiving chemotherapy without transplantation (P = 0.001), and the rate of overall survival was 53 and 32 percent, respectively (P = 0.038). CONCLUSIONS: As compared with conventional chemotherapy, treatment with high-dose chemotherapy and autologous bone marrow transplantation increases event-free and overall survival in patients with chemotherapy-sensitive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in relapse.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejm199512073332305

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 2,439

Metadata

Authors
Philip, T., Guglielmi, C., Hagenbeek, A., Somers, R., Van Der Lelie, H., Bron, D., Sonneveld, P., Gisselbrecht, C., Cahn, J.-Y., Harousseau, J.-L., Coiffier, B., Biron, P., Mandelli, F., & Chauvin, F.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
1995-12-07
Volume
333
Issue
23
Pages
1540-1545
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W1997353354
Cited by
2,439
References
0
FWCI
35.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Autologous Bone Marrow Transplantation as Compared with Salvage Chemotherapy in Relapses of Chemotherapy-Sensitive Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm199512073332305
The paper
Philip, T., Guglielmi, C., Hagenbeek, A., Somers, R., Van Der Lelie, H., Bron, D., Sonneveld, P., Gisselbrecht, C., Cahn, J.-Y., Harousseau, J.-L., Coiffier, B., Biron, P., Mandelli, F., & Chauvin, F. (1995). Autologous Bone Marrow Transplantation as Compared with Salvage Chemotherapy in Relapses of Chemotherapy-Sensitive Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199512073332305

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.