The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
BRCA1 Mutations in a Population-Based Sample of Young Women with Breast Cancer
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Inherited mutations in the BRCA1 gene are associated with a high risk of breast and ovarian cancer in some families. However, little is known about the contribution of BRCA1 mutations to breast cancer in the general population. We analyzed DNA samples from women enrolled in a population-based study of early-onset breast cancer to assess the spectrum and frequency of germ-line BRCA1 mutations in young women with breast cancer. METHODS: We studied 80 women in whom breast cancer was diagnosed before the age of 35, and who were not selected on the basis of family history. Genomic DNA was studied for BRCA1 mutations by analysis involving single-strand conformation polymorphisms and with allele-specific assays. Alterations were defined by DNA sequencing. RESULTS: Germ-line BRCA1 mutations were identified in 6 of the 80 women. Four additional rare sequence variants of unknown functional importance were also identified. Two of the mutations and three of the rare sequence variants were found among the 39 women who reported no family history of breast or ovarian cancer. None of the mutations and only one of the rare variants was identified in a reference population of 73 unrelated subjects. CONCLUSIONS: Alterations in BRCA1 were identified in approximately 10 percent of this cohort of young women with breast cancer. The risk of harboring a mutation was not limited to women with family histories of breast or ovarian cancer. These results represent a minimal estimate of the frequency of BRCA1 mutations in this population. Comprehensive methods of identifying BRCA1 mutations and understanding their importance will be needed before testing of women in the general population can be undertaken.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Risks of cancer in BRCA1-mutation carriers
FORD, D. (1994) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(94)91578-4 · Cited by 1,850
Cited by
Strong clustering and stereotyped nature of Notch3 mutations in CADASIL patients
Joutel, A., Vahedi, K., Corpechot, C., Troesch, A., Chabriat, H., Vayssière, C., Cruaud, C., Maciazek, J., Weissenbach, J., Bousser, M.-G., et al. (1997) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(97)08083-5 · Cited by 682
Metadata
- Authors
- Langston, A. A., Malone, K. E., Thompson, J. D., Daling, J. R., & Ostrander, E. A.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 1996-01-18
- Volume
- 334
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 137-142
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2029058389
- Cited by
- 286
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 26.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: BRCA1 Mutations in a Population-Based Sample of Young Women with Breast Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm199601183340301
- The paper
- Langston, A. A., Malone, K. E., Thompson, J. D., Daling, J. R., & Ostrander, E. A. (1996). BRCA1 Mutations in a Population-Based Sample of Young Women with Breast Cancer. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199601183340301
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.