The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Efficacy of Terazosin, Finasteride, or Both in Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Men with benign prostatic hyperplasia can be treated with alpha 1-adrenergic-antagonist drugs that relax prostatic smooth muscle or with drugs that inhibit 5 alpha-reductase and therefore reduce tissue androgen concentrations. However, the effects of the two types of drugs have not been compared. METHODS: We compared the safety and efficacy of placebo, terazosin (10 mg daily), finasteride (5 mg daily), and the combination of both drugs in 1229 men with benign prostatic hyperplasia. American Urological Association symptom scores and peak urinary-flow rates were determined at base line and periodically for one year. RESULTS: The mean changes from base line in the symptom scores in the placebo, finasteride, terazosin, and combination-therapy groups at one year were decreases of 2.6, 3.2, 6.1, and 6.2 points, respectively (P<0.001 for the comparisons of both terazosin and combination therapy with finasteride and with placebo). The mean changes at one year in the peak urinary-flow rates were increases of 1.4, 1.6, 2.7, and 3.2 ml per second, respectively (P<0.001 for the comparisons of both terazosin and combination therapy with finasteride and with placebo). Finasteride had no more effect on either measure than placebo. In the placebo group, 1.6 percent of the men discontinued the study because of adverse effects, as did 4.8 to 7.8 percent of the men in the other three groups. CONCLUSIONS: In men with benign prostatic hyperplasia, terazosin was effective therapy, whereas finasteride was not, and the combination of terazosin and finasteride was no more effective than terazosin alone.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
McConnell, J. D., Bruskewitz, R., Walsh, P., Andriole, G., Lieber, M., Holtgrewe, H. L., Albertsen, P., Roehrborn, C. G., Nickel, J. C., Wang, D. Z., et al. (1998) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199802263380901 · Cited by 1,120
Madersbacher, S., Alivizatos, G., Nordling, J., Sanz, C. R., Emberton, M., & de la Rosette, J. J. M. C. H. (2004) · European Urology · doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2004.07.016 · Cited by 622
A Review of 12 Commonly Used Medicinal Herbs
O'Hara, M. (1998) · Archives of Family Medicine · doi:10.1001/archfami.7.6.523 · Cited by 477
Benign prostatic hyperplasia: an overview
Ziada, A., Rosenblum, M., & Crawford, E. D. (1999) · Urology · doi:10.1016/s0090-4295(98)00532-9 · Cited by 431
Management of Overactive Bladder
Ouslander, J. G. (2004) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra032662 · Cited by 411
Metadata
- Authors
- Lepor, H., Williford, W. O., Barry, M. J., Brawer, M. K., Dixon, C. M., Gormley, G., Haakenson, C., Machi, M., Narayan, P., & Padley, R. J.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 1996-08-22
- Volume
- 335
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 533-540
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2331302678
- Cited by
- 792
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 71.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Efficacy of Terazosin, Finasteride, or Both in Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm199608223350801
- The paper
- Lepor, H., Williford, W. O., Barry, M. J., Brawer, M. K., Dixon, C. M., Gormley, G., Haakenson, C., Machi, M., Narayan, P., & Padley, R. J. (1996). The Efficacy of Terazosin, Finasteride, or Both in Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199608223350801
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.