Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 599

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Epidural Corticosteroid Injections for Sciatica Due to Herniated Nucleus Pulposus

Carette, Simon, Leclaire, Richard, Marcoux, Sylvie, Morin, Frédéric, Blaise, Gilbert A., St.-Pierre, André, Truchon, René, Parent, François, Lévesque, Jacques, Bergeron, Vincent, Montminy, Patrice, Blanchette, Caty·1997·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although epidural corticosteroid injections are commonly used for sciatica, their efficacy has not been established. METHODS: In a randomized, double-blind trial, we administered up to three epidural injections of methylprednisolone acetate (80 mg in 8 ml of isotonic saline) or isotonic saline (1 ml) to 158 patients with sciatica due to a herniated nucleus pulposus. All patients had Oswestry disability scores higher than 20 (on a scale of 1 to 100, with scores of 20 or less indicating minimal disability, and higher scores greater disability). RESULTS: At three weeks, the Oswestry score had improved by a mean of -8.0 in the methylprednisolone group and -5.5 in the placebo group (95 percent confidence interval for the difference, -7.1 to 2.2). Differences in improvements between the groups were not significant, except for improvements in the finger-to-floor distance (P=0.006) and sensory deficits (P=0.03), which were greater in the methylprednisolone group. After six weeks, the only significant difference was the improvement in leg pain, which was greater in the methylprednisolone group (P=0.03). After three months, there were no significant differences between the groups. The Oswestry score had improved by a mean of -17.3 in the methylprednisolone group and -15.4 in the placebo group (95 percent confidence interval for the difference, -9.3 to 5.4). At 12 months, the cumulative probability of back surgery was 25.8 percent in the methylprednisolone group and 24.8 percent in the placebo group (P=0.90). CONCLUSIONS: Although epidural injections of methylprednisolone may afford short-term improvement in leg pain and sensory deficits in patients with sciatica due to a herniated nucleus pulposus, this treatment offers no significant functional benefit, nor does it reduce the need for surgery.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejm199706053362303

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 25 references

Cited by

See all 599

Metadata

Authors
Carette, S., Leclaire, R., Marcoux, S., Morin, F., Blaise, G. A., St.-Pierre, A., Truchon, R., Parent, F., Lévesque, J., Bergeron, V., Montminy, P., & Blanchette, C.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
1997-06-05
Volume
336
Issue
23
Pages
1634-1640
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2323008516
Cited by
599
References
25
FWCI
8.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Epidural Corticosteroid Injections for Sciatica Due to Herniated Nucleus Pulposus. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm199706053362303
The paper
Carette, S., Leclaire, R., Marcoux, S., Morin, F., Blaise, G. A., St.-Pierre, A., Truchon, R., Parent, F., Lévesque, J., Bergeron, V., Montminy, P., & Blanchette, C. (1997). Epidural Corticosteroid Injections for Sciatica Due to Herniated Nucleus Pulposus. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199706053362303

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.