The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Fifty Years Later: The Significance of the Nuremberg Code
Abstract
The Nuremberg Code 1. The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by . . .
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Silent World of Doctor and Patient
Katz, J. (2002) · Johns Hopkins University Press eBooks · doi:10.56021/9780801857805 · Cited by 992
The Nazi Doctors and the Nuremberg Code Human Rights in Human Experimentation
Annas, G. J., & Grodin, M. A. (1992) · Oxford University Press eBooks · Cited by 337
Medical Science under Dictatorship
Alexander, L. (1949) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm194907142410201 · Cited by 281
Legacies of Nuremberg. Medical ethics and human rights
Grodin, M. A. (1996) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.276.20.1682 · Cited by 74
Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments
Com, A. (1996) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195107920.002.0002 · Cited by 59
Reassessing the influence of the Nuremberg Code on American medical ethics.
Moreno, J. D. (1997) · PubMed · Cited by 20
Cited by
Ethics in cybersecurity research and practice
Macnish, K., & van der Ham, J. (2020) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101382 · Cited by 73
The Inescapable Relevance of Bioethics for the Practicing Clinician
Carrese, J. A., & Sugarman, J. (2006) · Chest · doi:10.1378/chest.130.6.1864 · Cited by 59
Bioengineered Efficacy Models of Skin Disease: Advances in the Last 10 Years
Stanton, D. N., Ganguli-Indra, G., Indra, A. K., & Karande, P. (2022) · Pharmaceutics · doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics14020319 · Cited by 22
Metadata
- Authors
- Shuster, E.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 1997-11-13
- Volume
- 337
- Issue
- 20
- Pages
- 1436-1440
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2314085810
- Cited by
- 668
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 14.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fifty Years Later: The Significance of the Nuremberg Code. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm199711133372006
- The paper
- Shuster, E. (1997). Fifty Years Later: The Significance of the Nuremberg Code. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199711133372006
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
