The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Effect of Computed Tomography of the Appendix on Treatment of Patients and Use of Hospital Resources
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: In patients with clinically suspected appendicitis, computed tomography (CT) is diagnostically accurate. However, the effect of routine CT of the appendix on the treatment of such patients and the use of hospital resources is unknown. METHODS: We performed appendiceal CT on 100 consecutive patients in the emergency department who, on the basis of history, physical examination, and laboratory results, were to be hospitalized for observation for suspected appendicitis or for urgent appendectomy. Outcomes were determined at surgery and by pathological examination in 59 patients, and by clinical follow-up two months later in 41 patients. Treatment plans made before CT were compared with the patients' actual treatment. We also determined the costs of surgery that revealed no appendicitis (from data on 61 patients), one day of observation in the hospital (from data on 350 patient-days in patients with suspected appendicitis), and appendiceal CT (from data on all pelvic CT examinations in 1996). RESULTS: Fifty-three patients had appendicitis, and 47 did not. The interpretations of the appendiceal CT scans were 98 percent accurate. The results of CT led to changes in the treatment of 59 patients. These changes resulted in the prevention of unnecessary appendectomy in 13 patients, admission to the hospital for observation in 18 patients, admission to the hospital for observation before necessary appendectomy in 21 patients, and admission to the hospital for observation before the diagnosis of other conditions by CT in 11 patients. The effects of performing appendiceal CT on the use of hospital resources included the prevention of unnecessary appendectomy in 13 patients (for a savings of $47,281) and the prevention of unnecessary hospital admission for 50 patient-days (for a savings of $20,250). After the cost of 100 appendiceal CT studies ($22,800) was subtracted, the overall savings was $447 per patient. CONCLUSIONS: Routine appendiceal CT performed in patients who present with suspected appendicitis improves patient care and reduces the use of hospital resources.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Salminen, P., Paajanen, H., Rautio, T., Nordström, P., Aarnio, M., Rantanen, T., Tuominen, R., Hurme, S., Virtanen, J., Mecklin, J.-P., et al. (2015) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2015.6154 · Cited by 817
Appendicitis at the Millennium
Birnbaum, B. A., & Wilson, S. R. (2000) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiology.215.2.r00ma24337 · Cited by 631
Has Misdiagnosis of Appendicitis Decreased Over Time?: A Population-Based Analysis
Flum, D. R., Morris, A., Koepsell, T., & Dellinger, E. P. (2001) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.286.14.1748 · Cited by 498
Imaging Patients with Acute Abdominal Pain
Stoker, J., van Randen, A., Laméris, W., & Boermeester, M. A. (2009) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2531090302 · Cited by 431
How time affects the risk of rupture in appendicitis
Bickell, N. A., Aufses, A. H., Rojas, M., & Bodian, C. (2006) · Journal of the American College of Surgeons · doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2005.11.016 · Cited by 370
Metadata
- Authors
- Rao, P. M., Rhea, J. T., Novelline, R. A., Mostafavi, A. A., & McCabe, C. J.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 1998-01-15
- Volume
- 338
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 141-146
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2017626638
- Cited by
- 711
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 55.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effect of Computed Tomography of the Appendix on Treatment of Patients and Use of Hospital Resources. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm199801153380301
- The paper
- Rao, P. M., Rhea, J. T., Novelline, R. A., Mostafavi, A. A., & McCabe, C. J. (1998). Effect of Computed Tomography of the Appendix on Treatment of Patients and Use of Hospital Resources. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199801153380301
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.