The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Effect of Reperfusion on Biventricular Function and Survival after Right Ventricular Infarction
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Although the salutary effects of reperfusion in patients with left ventricular infarction are well documented, the benefits in patients with acute right ventricular infarction are less clear. METHODS: To determine whether primary angioplasty improves right ventricular function and the clinical outcome in patients with right ventricular infarction, we performed echocardiographic studies before and after angioplasty in 53 patients with acute right ventricular infarction. RESULTS: Complete reperfusion, defined as normal flow in the right main coronary artery and its major right ventricular branches, was achieved in 41 patients (77 percent), leading to prompt and striking recovery of right ventricular function (mean [+/-SE] score for free-wall motion, 3.0+/-0.1 at base line and 1.4+/-0.1 at three days; P<0.001). Twelve patients (23 percent) had unsuccessful reperfusion, defined as the failure to restore right ventricular branch flow, with or without patency of the right main coronary artery. Unsuccessful reperfusion was associated with lack of recovery of right ventricular function (score for free-wall motion, 3.2+/-0.2 at base line and 3.0+/-0.9 at three days; P= 0.55), as well as persistent hypotension and low cardiac output (in 83 percent of the patients, vs. 12 percent of those with successful reperfusion; P=0.002) and a high mortality rate (58 percent, vs. 2 percent for those with successful reperfusion; P=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with right ventricular infarction, complete reperfusion of the right coronary artery by angioplasty results in the dramatic recovery of right ventricular performance and an excellent clinical outcome. In contrast, unsuccessful reperfusion is associated with impaired recovery of right ventricular function, persistent hemodynamic compromise, and a high mortality rate.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Priori, S. G., Blomström-Lundqvist, C., Mazzanti, A., Blom, N., Borggrefe, M., Camm, J., Elliott, P. M., Fitzsimons, D., Hatala, R., Hindricks, G., et al. (2015) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehv316 · Cited by 3,893
Haddad, F., Hunt, S. A., Rosenthal, D. N., & Murphy, D. J. (2008) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.107.653576 · Cited by 1,523
Haddad, F., Doyle, R., Murphy, D. J., & Hunt, S. A. (2008) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.107.653584 · Cited by 1,304
Harjola, V.-P., Mebazaa, A., Čelutkienė, J., Bettex, D., Bueno, H., Chioncel, O., Crespo-Leiro, M. G., Falk, V., Filippatos, G., Gibbs, S., et al. (2016) · European Journal of Heart Failure · doi:10.1002/ejhf.478 · Cited by 720
Brutsaert, D. L. (2003) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00017.2002 · Cited by 697
Metadata
- Authors
- Bowers, T. R., O'Neill, W. W., Grines, C., Pica, M. C., Safian, R. D., & Goldstein, J. A.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 1998-04-02
- Volume
- 338
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- 933-940
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2335903296
- Cited by
- 307
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effect of Reperfusion on Biventricular Function and Survival after Right Ventricular Infarction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm199804023381401
- The paper
- Bowers, T. R., O'Neill, W. W., Grines, C., Pica, M. C., Safian, R. D., & Goldstein, J. A. (1998). Effect of Reperfusion on Biventricular Function and Survival after Right Ventricular Infarction. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199804023381401
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.