The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Lack of Efficacy of Light Reduction in Preventing Retinopathy of Prematurity
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Hospital-nursery lighting has been suggested as a factor in causing retinopathy of prematurity. Despite ongoing debate, a causal relation has not been established. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, randomized, multicenter study of the effects of light reduction on 409 premature infants with birth weights of less than 1251 g and gestational ages of less than 31 weeks. Two hundred five infants were exposed to reduced light, and 204 to typical nursery lighting. The amount of light reaching the infants' eyes was reduced within 24 hours after birth by placing goggles on the infants that reduced visible-light exposure by 97 percent and ultraviolet-light exposure by 100 percent. The babies wore the goggles until 31 weeks' postconceptional age or 4 weeks after birth, whichever was longer. Once the goggles were removed, ophthalmologists masked to the treatment assignments assessed the infants for retinopathy of prematurity at least biweekly for up to 13 weeks. RESULTS: There were 188 infants in the group that wore goggles and 173 in the control group who survived and were available for follow-up. The mean birth weights were 906 g in the goggles group and 914 g in the control group; the mean gestational ages were 27.4 weeks and 27.2 weeks, respectively. The mean ambient-light level adjacent to the infants' faces was 399 lux for the goggles group and 447 lux for the control group. Retinopathy of prematurity was diagnosed in 102 infants (54 percent) in the goggles group and 100 (58 percent) in the control group (relative risk, 0.9; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.8 to 1.1; P=0.50). CONCLUSIONS: A reduction in ambient-light exposure does not alter the incidence of retinopathy of prematurity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Flynn, J. T., & Bancalari, E. (2000) · Journal of American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus · doi:10.1067/mpa.2000.105823 · Cited by 620
Screening Examination of Premature Infants for Retinopathy of Prematurity
Ophthalmology, S. O., American Academy of Pediatrics, American Academy of Ophthalmology, & American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus (2006) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2005-2749 · Cited by 444
Brandon, D. H., Holditch-Davis, D., & Belyea, M. (2002) · The Journal of Pediatrics · doi:10.1067/mpd.2002.121932 · Cited by 163
Rest-Activity Patterns of Premature Infants Are Regulated by Cycled Lighting
Rivkees, S. A., Mayes, L., Jacobs, H., & Gross, I. (2004) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.113.4.833 · Cited by 155
Boo, N., Chee, S., & Rohana, J. (2002) · Acta Paediatrica · doi:10.1111/j.1651-2227.2002.tb03301.x · Cited by 36
Metadata
- Authors
- Reynolds, J. D., Hardy, R. J., Kennedy, K. A., Spencer, R., van Heuven, W. A. J., & Fielder, A. R.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 1998-05-28
- Volume
- 338
- Issue
- 22
- Pages
- 1572-1576
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2341316795
- Cited by
- 225
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Lack of Efficacy of Light Reduction in Preventing Retinopathy of Prematurity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm199805283382202
- The paper
- Reynolds, J. D., Hardy, R. J., Kennedy, K. A., Spencer, R., van Heuven, W. A. J., & Fielder, A. R. (1998). Lack of Efficacy of Light Reduction in Preventing Retinopathy of Prematurity. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199805283382202
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.