Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 768

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Clinical Significance of Minimal Residual Disease in Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Open access
Cavé, Hélène, van der Werff ten Bosch, Jutte, Suciu, Stefan, Guidal, Christine, Waterkeyn, Christine, Otten, Jacques, Bakkus, Marleen, Thielemans, Kris, Grandchamp, Bernard, Vilmer, Etienne, Nelken, Brigitte, Fournier, Martine, Boutard, Patrick, Lebrun, Emmanuel, Méchinaud, Françoise, Garand, Richard, Robert, Alain, Dastugue, Nicole, Plouvier, Emmanuel, Racadot, Evelyne, Ferster, Alice, Gyselinck, Jan, Fenneteau, Odile, Duval, Michel, Solbu, Gabriel, Manel, Anne-Marie·1998·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND METHODS: The implications of the detection of residual disease after treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) are unclear. We conducted a prospective study at 11 centers to determine the predictive value of the presence or absence of detectable residual disease at several points in time during the first six months after complete remission of childhood ALL had been induced. Junctional sequences of T-cell-receptor or immunoglobulin gene rearrangements were used as clonal markers of leukemic cells. Residual disease was quantitated with a competitive polymerase-chain-reaction (PCR) assay. Of 246 patients enrolled at diagnosis and treated with a uniform chemotherapy protocol, 178 were monitored for residual disease with one clone-specific probe (in 74 percent) or more than one probe (in 26 percent). The median follow-up period was 38 months. RESULTS: The presence or absence and level of residual leukemia were significantly correlated with the risk of early relapse at each of the times studied (P<0.001). PCR measurements identified patients at high risk for relapse after the completion of induction therapy (those with > or =10(-2) residual blasts) or at later time points (those with > or =10(-3) residual blasts). Multivariate analysis showed that as compared with immunophenotype, age, risk group (standard or very high risk), and white-cell count at diagnosis, the presence or absence and level of residual disease were the most powerful independent prognostic factors. CONCLUSIONS: Residual leukemia after induction of a remission is a powerful prognostic factor in childhood ALL. Detection of residual disease by PCR should be used to identify patients at risk for relapse and should be taken into account in considering alternative treatment.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejm199808273390904

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 768

Metadata

Authors
Cavé, H., van der Werff ten Bosch, J., Suciu, S., Guidal, C., Waterkeyn, C., Otten, J., Bakkus, M., Thielemans, K., Grandchamp, B., Vilmer, E., Nelken, B., Fournier, M., Boutard, P., Lebrun, E., Méchinaud, F., Garand, R., Robert, A., Dastugue, N., Plouvier, E., Racadot, E., Ferster, A., Gyselinck, J., Fenneteau, O., Duval, M., Solbu, G., & Manel, A.-M.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
1998-08-27
Volume
339
Issue
9
Pages
591-598
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2313577290
Cited by
768
References
1
FWCI
59.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clinical Significance of Minimal Residual Disease in Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm199808273390904
The paper
Cavé, H., van der Werff ten Bosch, J., Suciu, S., Guidal, C., Waterkeyn, C., Otten, J., Bakkus, M., Thielemans, K., Grandchamp, B., Vilmer, E., Nelken, B., Fournier, M., Boutard, P., Lebrun, E., Méchinaud, F., Garand, R., Robert, A., Dastugue, N., Plouvier, E., . . . Manel, A.-M. (1998). Clinical Significance of Minimal Residual Disease in Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199808273390904

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.