The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Determinants of Preterm Birth Rates in Canada from 1981 through 1983 and from 1992 through 1994
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: The rates of preterm birth have increased in many countries, including Canada, over the past 20 years. However, the factors underlying the increase are poorly understood. METHODS: We used data from the Statistics Canada live-birth and stillbirth data bases to determine the effects of changes in the frequency of multiple births, registration of births occurring very early in gestation, patterns of obstetrical intervention, and use of ultrasonographic dating of gestational age on the rates of preterm birth in Canada from 1981 through 1983 and from 1992 through 1994. All births in 9 of the 12 provinces and territories of Canada were included. Logistic-regression analysis and Poisson regression analysis were used to estimate changes between the two three-year periods, after adjustment for the above-mentioned determinants of the likelihood of preterm births. RESULTS: Preterm births increased from 6.3 percent of live births in 1981 through 1983 to 6.8 percent in 1992 through 1994, a relative increase of 9 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 7 to 10 percent). Among singleton births, preterm births increased by 5 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 3 to 6 percent). Multiple births increased from 1.9 percent to 2.1 percent of all live births; the rates of preterm birth among live births resulting from multiple gestations increased by 25 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 21 to 28 percent). Adjustment for the determinants of the likelihood of preterm birth reduced the increase in the rate of preterm birth to 3 percent among all live births and 1 percent among singleton births. CONCLUSIONS: The recent increase in preterm births in Canada is largely attributable to changes in the frequency of multiple births, obstetrical intervention, and the use of ultrasound-based estimates of gestational age.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1990) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.27-3338 · Cited by 35,305
Regression Diagnostics: Identifying Influential Data and Sources of Collinearity
Belsley, D. A., Kuh, E., & Welsch, R. E. (1980) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/0471725153 · Cited by 7,297
Cited by
the GAPPS Review Group, Lawn, J. E., Gravett, M. G., Nunes, T. M., Rubens, C. E., & Stanton, C. (2010) · BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth · doi:10.1186/1471-2393-10-s1-s1 · Cited by 784
Slattery, M. M., & Morrison, J. J. (2002) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(02)11476-0 · Cited by 675
Etiology and prevention of stillbirth
Fretts, R. C. (2005) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2005.03.074 · Cited by 462
Epidemiology of preterm birth and its clinical subtypes
Ananth, C. V., Ananth, C. V., & Vintzileos, A. M. (2006) · The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine · doi:10.1080/14767050600965882 · Cited by 461
Shah, N. R., & Bracken, M. B. (2000) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/s0002-9378(00)70240-7 · Cited by 394
Metadata
- Authors
- Joseph, K. S., Kramer, M. S., Marcoux, S., Ohlsson, A., Wen, S. W., Allen, A., & Platt, R.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 1998-11-12
- Volume
- 339
- Issue
- 20
- Pages
- 1434-1439
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2089837054
- Cited by
- 357
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 19.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Determinants of Preterm Birth Rates in Canada from 1981 through 1983 and from 1992 through 1994. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm199811123392004
- The paper
- Joseph, K. S., Kramer, M. S., Marcoux, S., Ohlsson, A., Wen, S. W., Allen, A., & Platt, R. (1998). Determinants of Preterm Birth Rates in Canada from 1981 through 1983 and from 1992 through 1994. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199811123392004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.