Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 504

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Surgery to Cure the Zollinger–Ellison Syndrome

Open access
Norton, Jeffrey A., Fraker, Douglas L., Alexander, H. Richard, Venzon, David J., Doppman, John L., Serrano, Jose, Goebel, Stephan U., Peghini, Paolo L., Roy, Praveen K., Gibril, Fathia, Jensen, Robert T.·1999·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND METHODS: The role of surgery in patients with the Zollinger-Ellison syndrome is controversial. To determine the efficacy of surgery in patients with this syndrome, we followed 151 consecutive patients who underwent laparotomy between 1981 and 1998. Of these patients, 123 had sporadic gastrinomas and 28 had multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 with an imaged tumor of at least 3 cm in diameter. Tumor-localization studies and functional localization studies were performed routinely. All patients underwent surgery according to a similar operative protocol, and all patients who had surgery after 1986 underwent duodenotomy. RESULTS: The 151 patients underwent 180 exploratory operations. The mean (+/-SD) follow-up after the first operation was 8+/-4 years. Gastrinomas were found in 141 of the patients (93 percent), including all of the last 81 patients to undergo surgery. The tumors were located in the duodenum in 74 patients (49 percent) and in the pancreas in 36 patients (24 percent); however, primary tumors were found in lymph nodes in 17 patients (11 percent) and in another location in 13 patients (9 percent). The primary location was unknown in 24 patients (16 percent). Among the patients with sporadic gastrinomas, 34 percent were free of disease at 10 years, as compared with none of the patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1. The overall 10-year survival rate was 94 percent. CONCLUSIONS: All patients with the Zollinger-Ellison syndrome who do not have multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 or metastatic disease should be offered surgical exploration for possible cure.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejm199908263410902

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 504

Metadata

Authors
Norton, J. A., Fraker, D. L., Alexander, H. R., Venzon, D. J., Doppman, J. L., Serrano, J., Goebel, S. U., Peghini, P. L., Roy, P. K., Gibril, F., & Jensen, R. T.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
1999-08-26
Volume
341
Issue
9
Pages
635-644
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2074590150
Cited by
504
References
0
FWCI
17.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Surgery to Cure the Zollinger–Ellison Syndrome. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm199908263410902
The paper
Norton, J. A., Fraker, D. L., Alexander, H. R., Venzon, D. J., Doppman, J. L., Serrano, J., Goebel, S. U., Peghini, P. L., Roy, P. K., Gibril, F., & Jensen, R. T. (1999). Surgery to Cure the Zollinger–Ellison Syndrome. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199908263410902

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.