The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A 10-Year Prospective Study of Primary Hyperparathyroidism with or without Parathyroid Surgery
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND AND METHODS: In the United States, most patients with primary hyperparathyroidism have few or no symptoms. The need for parathyroidectomy to treat all patients with this disorder has therefore been questioned. We studied the clinical course and development of complications for periods of up to 10 years in 121 patients with primary hyperparathyroidism, 101 (83 percent) of whom were asymptomatic. There were 30 men and 91 women (age range, 20 to 79 years). During the study, 61 patients (50 percent) underwent parathyroidectomy, and 60 patients were followed without surgery. RESULTS: Parathyroidectomy in patients with or without symptoms led to normalization of serum calcium concentrations and a mean (+/-SE) increase in lumbar-spine bone mineral density of 8+/-2 percent after 1 year (P=0.005) and 12+/-3 percent after 10 years (P=0.03). Bone mineral density of the femoral neck increased 6+/-1 percent after 1 year (P=0.002) and 14+/-4 percent after 10 years (P=0.002). Bone mineral density of the radius did not change significantly. The 52 asymptomatic patients who did not undergo surgery had no change in serum calcium concentration, urinary calcium excretion, or bone mineral density. However, 14 of these 52 patients (27 percent) had progression of disease, defined as the development of at least one new indication for parathyroidectomy. All 20 patients with symptoms had kidney stones. None of the 12 who underwent parathyroidectomy had recurrent kidney stones, whereas 6 of the 8 patients who did not undergo surgery did have a recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with primary hyperparathyroidism, parathyroidectomy results in the normalization of biochemical values and increased bone mineral density. Most asymptomatic patients who did not undergo surgery did not have progression of disease, but approximately one quarter of them did have some progression.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Metabolic Evaluation and Recurrence Prevention for Urinary Stone Patients: EAU Guidelines
Skolarikos, A., Straub, M., Knoll, T., Sarica, K., Seitz, C., Petřík, A., & Türk, C. (2015) · European Urology · doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2014.10.029 · Cited by 409
Secondary Causes of Osteoporosis
FITZPATRICK, L. A. (2002) · Mayo Clinic Proceedings · doi:10.1016/s0025-6196(11)62214-3 · Cited by 311
Hormones and Disorders of Mineral Metabolism
Bringhurst, F. R., Demay, M. B., & Kronenberg, H. M. (2011) · Williams Textbook of Endocrinology · doi:10.1016/b978-1-4377-0324-5.00028-6 · Cited by 298
A physiologically based mathematical model of integrated calcium homeostasis and bone remodeling
Peterson, M. C., & Riggs, M. M. (2010) · Bone · doi:10.1016/j.bone.2009.08.053 · Cited by 198
Metadata
- Authors
- Silverberg, S. J., Shane, E., Jacobs, T. P., Siris, E., & Bilezikian, J. P.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 1999-10-21
- Volume
- 341
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- 1249-1255
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2320972218
- Cited by
- 845
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 26.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A 10-Year Prospective Study of Primary Hyperparathyroidism with or without Parathyroid Surgery. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm199910213411701
- The paper
- Silverberg, S. J., Shane, E., Jacobs, T. P., Siris, E., & Bilezikian, J. P. (1999). A 10-Year Prospective Study of Primary Hyperparathyroidism with or without Parathyroid Surgery. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199910213411701
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.