The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Supplemental Perioperative Oxygen to Reduce the Incidence of Surgical-Wound Infection
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Destruction by oxidation, or oxidative killing, is the most important defense against surgical pathogens and depends on the partial pressure of oxygen in contaminated tissue. An easy method of improving oxygen tension in adequately perfused tissue is to increase the concentration of inspired oxygen. We therefore tested the hypothesis that the supplemental administration of oxygen during the perioperative period decreases the incidence of wound infection. METHODS: We randomly assigned 500 patients undergoing colorectal resection to receive 30 percent or 80 percent inspired oxygen during the operation and for two hours afterward. Anesthetic treatment was standardized, and all patients received prophylactic antibiotic therapy. With use of a double-blind protocol, wounds were evaluated daily until the patient was discharged and then at a clinic visit two weeks after surgery. We considered wounds with culture-positive pus to be infected. The timing of suture removal and the date of discharge were determined by the surgeon, who did not know the patient's treatment-group assignment. RESULTS: Arterial oxygen saturation was normal in both groups; however, the arterial and subcutaneous partial pressure of oxygen was significantly higher in the patients given 80 percent oxygen than in those given 30 percent oxygen. Among the 250 patients who received 80 percent oxygen, 13 (5.2 percent; 95 percent confidence interval, 2.4 to 8.0 percent) had surgical-wound infections, as compared with 28 of the 250 patients given 30 percent oxygen (11.2 percent; 95 percent confidence interval, 7.3 to 15.1 percent; P=0.01). The absolute difference between groups was 6.0 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 1.2 to 10.8 percent). The duration of hospitalization was similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: The perioperative administration of supplemental oxygen is a practical method of reducing the incidence of surgical-wound infections.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Wound Microbiology and Associated Approaches to Wound Management
Bowler, P. G., Duerden, B. I., & Armstrong, D. G. (2001) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.14.2.244-269.2001 · Cited by 1,634
Bratzler, D. W., & Houck, P. M. (2005) · The American Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.01.015 · Cited by 1,163
Abstinence From Smoking Reduces Incisional Wound Infection: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Sorensen, L. T., Karlsmark, T., & Gottrup, F. (2003) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/01.sla.0000074980.39700.31 · Cited by 551
Lindström, D., Azodi, O. S., Wladis, A., Tønnesen, H., Linder, S., Nåsell, H., Ponzer, S., & Adami, J. (2008) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/sla.0b013e3181889d0d · Cited by 530
Strategies to Prevent Surgical Site Infections in Acute Care Hospitals
Anderson, D. J., Kaye, K. S., Classen, D., Arias, K. M., Podgorny, K., Burstin, H., Calfee, D. P., Coffin, S. E., Dubberke, E. R., Fraser, V., et al. (2008) · Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology · doi:10.1086/591064 · Cited by 478
Metadata
- Authors
- Greif, R., Akça, O., Horn, E.-P., Kurz, A., & Sessler, D. I.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 2000-01-20
- Volume
- 342
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 161-167
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2319396397
- Cited by
- 1,159
- References
- 0
- Type
- supplementary materials
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Supplemental Perioperative Oxygen to Reduce the Incidence of Surgical-Wound Infection. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm200001203420303
- The paper
- Greif, R., Akça, O., Horn, E.-P., Kurz, A., & Sessler, D. I. (2000). Supplemental Perioperative Oxygen to Reduce the Incidence of Surgical-Wound Infection. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm200001203420303
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.