Cited by 238Acute Myocardial Infarction ResearchSex and Gender in HealthcareDiversity and Career in Medicine

Relation of race and sex to the use of reperfusion therapy in Medicare beneficiaries with acute myocardial infarction

Open access
Canto, John G., Allison, Jeroan J., Kiefe, Catarina I., Fincher, Contessa, Farmer, Robert, Sekar, Padmini, Person, Sharina, Weissman, Norman W.·2000·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

Background There are few reports describing the combined influence of the race and sex of a patient on the use of reperfusion therapy for acute myocardial infarction. Methods To determine the relation of race and sex to the receipt of reperfusion therapy for myocardial infarction in the United States, we reviewed the medical records of 234,769 Medicare patients with myocardial infarction. From these records we identified 26,575 white or black patients who met strict eligibility criteria for reperfusion therapy. We then performed bivariate and multivariate analyses of prevalence ratios to determine predictors of the use of reperfusion therapy in four subgroups of patients categorized according to race and sex: white men, white women, black men, and black women. Results Among eligible patients, white men received reperfusion therapy with the highest frequency (59 percent), followed by white women (56 percent), black men (50 percent), and black women (44 percent). After adjustment for differences in demographic and clinical characteristics, white women were as likely as white men to receive reperfusion therapy (prevalence ratio, 1.00; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.98 to 1.03). Likewise, black women were as likely as black men to receive reperfusion therapy (prevalence ratio, 1.00; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.89 to 1.13). However, black women were significantly less likely to receive reperfusion therapy than white men (prevalence ratio, 0.90; 95 percent confidence inter…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejm200004133421505

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Considering as radically different certain situations that are, to some extent, similar in health for men and women can eventually produce inequities such as the fact that for the same coronary pathological condition, women do not receive the same health care or the same medical and surgical treatment.

    “Considering as radically different certain situations that are, to some extent, similar in health for men and women can eventually produce inequities such as the fact that for the same coronary pathological condition, women do not receive the same health care or the same medical and surgical treatment (Ayanian & Epstein, 1991; Canto et al., 2000; Melberg, Kindervaag, & R”

    From Health From a Gender Perspective (2017) · cites this paper as Canto et al., 2000

  • This could be the case of reperfusion therapy in acute myocardial infarction.

    “This could be the case of reperfusion therapy in acute myocardial infarction (Canto et al., 2000; McAlister et al., 1999).”

    From Health From a Gender Perspective (2017) · cites this paper as Canto et al., 2000

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 26 · Cited by 238

Authors
Canto, J. G., Allison, J. J., Kiefe, C. I., Fincher, C., Farmer, R., Sekar, P., Person, S., & Weissman, N. W.
Affiliations
University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2000-04-13
Volume
342
Issue
15
Pages
1094-1100
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2009181589
Cited by
238
References
26
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 7
FWCI
14.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship@UMassChan (submittedVersion)
  • DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (HS08843, HS-09446)
  • National Center for Research Resources (RR 00032)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Sex and Gender in Healthcare
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Diversity and Career in Medicine
Keywords
reperfusion therapy, acute myocardial infarction, racial disparities, sex differences, Medicare beneficiaries, black-white disparities, women's health
MeSH terms
Aged, Black or African American, Female, Medicare, Humans, Male, Myocardial Infarction, Retrospective Studies, Sex Factors, United States, Thrombolytic Therapy, Multivariate Analysis, Patient Selection, Black People, White People

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review