The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Preoperative Staging of Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer with Positron-Emission Tomography
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Determining the stage of non-small-cell lung cancer often requires multiple preoperative tests and invasive procedures. Whole-body positron-emission tomography (PET) may simplify and improve the evaluation of patients with this tumor. METHODS: We prospectively compared the ability of a standard approach to staging (computed tomography [CT], ultrasonography, bone scanning, and, when indicated, needle biopsies) and one involving PET to detect metastases in mediastinal lymph nodes and at distant sites in 102 patients with resectable non-small-cell lung cancer. The presence of mediastinal metastatic disease was confirmed histopathologically. Distant metastases that were detected by PET were further evaluated by standard imaging tests and biopsies. Patients were followed postoperatively for six months by standard methods to detect occult metastases. Logistic-regression analysis was used to evaluate the ability of PET and CT to identify malignant mediastinal lymph nodes. RESULTS: The sensitivity and specificity of PET for the detection of mediastinal metastases were 91 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 81 to 100 percent) and 86 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 78 to 94 percent), respectively. The corresponding values for CT were 75 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 60 to 90 percent) and 66 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 55 to 77 percent). When the results of PET and CT were adjusted for each other, only PET results were positively correlated with the histopathological findings in mediastinal lymph nodes (P<0.001). PET identified distant metastases that had not been found by standard methods in 11 of 102 patients. The sensitivity and specificity of PET for the detection of both mediastinal and distant metastatic disease were 95 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 88 to 100 percent) and 83 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 74 to 92 percent), respectively. The use of PET to identify the stage of the disease resulted in a different stage from the one determined by standard methods in 62 patients: the stage was lowered in 20 and raised in 42. CONCLUSIONS: PET improves the rate of detection of local and distant metastases in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1992) · PubMed Central · doi:10.2967/jnumed.120.251744a · Cited by 1,172
Cited by
Minna, J. D., Roth, J. A., & Gazdar, A. F. (2002) · Cancer Cell · doi:10.1016/s1535-6108(02)00027-2 · Cited by 549
Antoch, G., Saoudi, N., Kuehl, H., Dahmen, G., Mueller, S. P., Beyer, T., Bockisch, A., Debatin, J. F., & Freudenberg, L. S. (2004) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2004.08.120 · Cited by 435
Blodgett, T. M., Meltzer, C. C., & Townsend, D. W. (2007) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2422051113 · Cited by 387
(2004) · PubMed · Cited by 211
Kaira, K., Higuchi, T., Naruse, I., Arisaka, Y., Tokue, A., Altan, B., Suda, S., Mogi, A., Shimizu, K., Sunaga, N., et al. (2018) · European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging · doi:10.1007/s00259-017-3806-1 · Cited by 195
Metadata
- Authors
- Pieterman, R. M., van Putten, J. W. G., Meuzelaar, J. J., Mooyaart, E. L., Vaalburg, W., Koëter, G. H., Fidler, V., Pruim, J., & Groen, H. J. M.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 2000-07-27
- Volume
- 343
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 254-261
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2339934527
- Cited by
- 1,111
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 68.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Preoperative Staging of Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer with Positron-Emission Tomography. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm200007273430404
- The paper
- Pieterman, R. M., van Putten, J. W. G., Meuzelaar, J. J., Mooyaart, E. L., Vaalburg, W., Koëter, G. H., Fidler, V., Pruim, J., & Groen, H. J. M. (2000). Preoperative Staging of Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer with Positron-Emission Tomography. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm200007273430404
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.