Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 483

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Central Diabetes Insipidus in Children and Young Adults

Open access
Maghnie, Mohamad, Cosi, Gianluca, Genovese, Eugenio, Manca-Bitti, Maria Luisa, Cohen, Amnon, Zecca, Silvia, Tinelli, Carmine, Gallucci, Massimo, Bernasconi, Sergio, Boscherini, Brunetto, Severi, Francesca, Aricò, Maurizio·2000·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Central diabetes insipidus is rare in children and young adults, and up to 50 percent of cases are idiopathic. The clinical presentation and the long-term course of this disorder are largely undefined. METHODS: We studied all 79 patients with central diabetes insipidus who were seen at four pediatric endocrinology units between 1970 and 1996. There were 37 male and 42 female patients whose median age at diagnosis was 7.0 years (range, 0.1 to 24.8). All patients underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and periodic studies of anterior pituitary function. The median duration of follow-up was 7.6 years (range, 1.6 to 26.2). RESULTS: The causes of the central diabetes insipidus were Langerhans-cell histiocytosis in 12 patients, an intracranial tumor in 18 patients, a skull fracture in 2 patients, and autoimmune polyendocrinopathy in 1 patient; 5 patients had familial disease. The cause was considered to be idiopathic in 41 patients (52 percent). In 74 patients (94 percent) the posterior pituitary was not hyperintense on the first MRI scan obtained, and 29 patients (37 percent) had thickening of the pituitary stalk. Eighteen patients had changes in the thickness of the pituitary stalk over time, ranging from normalization (six patients) or a decrease in thickness (one patient) to further thickening (seven patients) or thickening of a previously normal stalk (four patients). Anterior pituitary hormone deficiencies, primarily growth hormone deficiency, were documented in 48 patients (61 percent) a median of 0.6 year (range, 0.1 to 18.0) after the onset of central diabetes insipidus. CONCLUSIONS: Most children and young adults with acquired central diabetes insipidus have abnormal findings on MRI scans of the head, which may change over time, and at least half have anterior pituitary hormone deficiencies during follow-up.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejm200010053431403

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 483

Metadata

Authors
Maghnie, M., Cosi, G., Genovese, E., Manca-Bitti, M. L., Cohen, A., Zecca, S., Tinelli, C., Gallucci, M., Bernasconi, S., Boscherini, B., Severi, F., & Aricò, M.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2000-10-05
Volume
343
Issue
14
Pages
998-1007
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2313201523
Cited by
483
References
0
FWCI
12.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Central Diabetes Insipidus in Children and Young Adults. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm200010053431403
The paper
Maghnie, M., Cosi, G., Genovese, E., Manca-Bitti, M. L., Cohen, A., Zecca, S., Tinelli, C., Gallucci, M., Bernasconi, S., Boscherini, B., Severi, F., & Aricò, M. (2000). Central Diabetes Insipidus in Children and Young Adults. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm200010053431403

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.